Hopwood a Difference of Opinion in Texas

By Smith, Susan E. | Black Issues in Higher Education, September 3, 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Hopwood a Difference of Opinion in Texas


Smith, Susan E., Black Issues in Higher Education


Despite being at odds with his predecessor, Texas attorney general is urging the state s higher education institutions to follow previous guidelines

AUSTIN, Texas-The state's flagship public universities will not reinstate race as a criterion in scholarship, financial aid or recruitment decisions despite an about-face on affirmative action by the state, college officials say.

Texas Attorney General John Cornyn earlier this month rescinded a 2.5-year-old opinion by his predecessor that ended affirmative action at all Texas public colleges and universities.

But Cornyn, a Republican, cautioned state university officials not to revert to such policies until the matter is settled once and for all in court. Re-instituting the policies could invite lawsuits, he warns.

The University of Texas at Austin will continue to use race-neutral scholarship and financial aid policies, says Dr. Patricia Ohlendorf, vice president for administration and legal affairs at the 50,000-student university. That sentiment was echoed by officials at Texas A&M University.

"We're still studying the opinion. But we've seen nothing so far to convince us to change our policies," says Kathy Harris, director of communications for Texas A&M in College Station.

The previous opinion by former Texas Attorney General Dan Morales, a Democrat, jeopardized minority access to the state's flagship public universities in a state in which minorities are expected to be the majority of residents in the next decade.

State higher education leaders complain that it also resulted in a "brain drain" of the brightest minority students to out-of-state universities that still can offer race-based scholarships.

The state's biggest universities still are struggling to recruit and retain minority students since the ban on affirmative action, based on a court decision on reverse discrimination at the University of Texas.

Following the 1997 opinion, lawmakers and university administrators rushed to find new methods to increase minority enrollment at Texas A&M and the University of Texas, selective public universities that were hardest hit by the affirmative action ban. Attendance at the universities, with their influential alumni groups, often is a path to powerful public and private sector positions.

A state senator urged Cornyn, who was elected in November, to review Morales' opinion. And even though it has no immediate effect, university officials praised Cornyn's opinion.

"We deeply appreciate the attorney general's efforts on behalf of the University of Texas and all of Texas higher education," Dr. William Cunningham, chancellor of the University of Texas System told reporters at a news conference here earlier this month.

Cornyn's office has joined the University of Texas in an appeal of the so-called Hopwood case. The 1992 lawsuit is named for Cheryl Hopwood, one of four White students who alleged they were denied admission to the university's law school because of their race.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in the students' favor. Some constitutional and civil rights lawyers have argued that the Hopwood ruling applies only to higher education admissions.

But Morales' interpretation of the ruling was to ban consideration of race in admissions, scholarships, financial aid and recruitment decisions - a decision that since has been criticized as too broad. Cornyn agreed.

"Absent clear guidance from the [U.S. Supreme Court], we think it inadvisable to reach broad conclusions on what may or may not be permitted under Hopwood on matters other than admissions," Cornyn said in a written statement. "Because [Morales'] opinion on the subject... does just that, we withdraw it."

The opinion also states: "Only the United States Supreme Court can resolve these sensitive issues with any degree of certainty."

Lawyers for the University of Texas and the state have argued before the 5th Circuit that the Hopwood decision runs counter to the Supreme Court's 1978 Bakke decision, which allows affirmative action programs to correct past racial discrimination.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Hopwood a Difference of Opinion in Texas
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?