A Note on the Foreign Exchange Market Efficiency Hypothesis

By Dutt, Swarna D.; Ghosh, Dipak | Journal of Economics and Finance, Summer 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

A Note on the Foreign Exchange Market Efficiency Hypothesis


Dutt, Swarna D., Ghosh, Dipak, Journal of Economics and Finance


Abstract

This paper examines the weak and strong forms of the foreign exchange market efficiency hypothesis (MEH) (as defined in the paper) using the recently available Harris-Inder null of cointegration procedure, which is powerful enough to distinguish between cointegration and near cointegration, and thus provide more robust results than conventional cointegration tests. Our results indicate that both forms of the MEH are rejected for all the major currencies of the European Economic Community (EEC). (JEL F310)

Introduction

In this note we re-examine the foreign exchange market efficiency hypothesis, which is a hotly debated topic in the area of international finance. It is basically the theory of informationally efficient markets applied to the foreign exchange arena. The present literature is far from conclusive and inconsistencies abound, as is evident from Lewis (1995).1 With the genesis of the concept of nonstationarity and cointegration came a new approach to testing market efficiency. A multitude of procedures are available, but the standard methodology has been to examine the forward market unbiasedness hypothesis, which tests whether forward rates are unbiased and efficient estimators of the future spot rate.

Acceptance of this hypothesis implies that the spot and forward foreign exchange rates have a tendency to move together over time, i.e., they are cointegrated in the Engle-Granger (EG 1987) sense. The estimated model is

Given this inconclusive state of affairs, we re-examine the MEH for the major EEC currencies over the floating exchange rate period3 using the recently available null of cointegration procedure which is able to distinguish between unit and near-unit roots. This avoids the problems with classical tests mentioned above. We first test stationarity of the log-levels of spot and forward rate series and then examine the bivariate cointegrating properties, using the Harris-Inder (HI 1994) methodology. The MEH is soundly rejected.

This study is divided into three sections. In section 2, we sequentially conduct the classical Dickey-Fuller (DF 1981) and the modern Kwiatkowski et al. (KPSS 1992) unit-root test on the series under consideration. The HI cointegration test is undertaken in section 3, followed by our results and brief concluding remarks.

Tests of Nonstationarity

We examine the nonstationarity of the spot and forward rate series using the standard DF procedure. The results are reported in Table 1.

As shown in Table 1, the value of the test statistic for the log-levels of each series in each case is less than the critical value, implying that the null hypothesis of nonstationarity (presence of unit-roots) cannot be rejected at the five-percent significance level.4

The DF results cannot be taken as conclusive evidence of the existence of unit roots. This method is restrictive because of the unrealistic assumption of identically and independently distributed (iid: 02) Gaussian processes. There is now a substantial body of evidence that financial time series including exchange rates exhibit time-dependent heteroskedasticity.

Another criticism of the classical unit-root testing procedure is that it cannot distinguish between unitroot and near-unit root stationary processes. This prompted the use of the Kwiatkowski et al. (KPSS 1992) method, where the null is stationarity and the alternative is the presence of a unit root. This ensures that the alternative will be accepted (null rejected) only when there is strong evidence for (against) it. The test statistics eta^sub r^ and eta^sub (mu) in Table 2 (for the spot and forward series) use the null of stationarity with and without a time trend, respectively.

Since in each case the test statistic is greater than the critical value, we reject the null of stationarity in favor of the alternative of unit roots. This agrees with the literature.

Null of Cointegration Procedure

The classical or the conventional nonstationarity test procedures examine the null hypothesis of a unit root, meaning the null will be accepted (not rejected) unless there is strong evidence against it.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Note on the Foreign Exchange Market Efficiency Hypothesis
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.