The Knowledge-Experience-Evaluation Relationship: A Structural Equations Modeling Test of Gender Differences

By Laroche, Michel; Cleveland, Mark; Bergeron, Jasmin; Goutaland, Christine | Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, September 2003 | Go to article overview

The Knowledge-Experience-Evaluation Relationship: A Structural Equations Modeling Test of Gender Differences


Laroche, Michel; Cleveland, Mark; Bergeron, Jasmin; Goutaland, Christine, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences


Abstract

This study examines the differences between males and females concerning the relationship of subjective knowledge (SK), experience (EXP), and perceived product evaluation difficulty (DE). Using survey data, we test structural equation models (SEM) of the relationships between these three variables, in the context of four product categories. We verify, via confirmatory factor analysis, that EXP and SK are separate yet related constructs. We then test separate (m/f) SEM models, followed by multi-group model analysis. A number of significant gender differences are revealed. For males, SK fully mediates the relationship between EXP and DE, whereas for females the latter is both directly and indirectly (via SK) related to EXP. Females' DE scores are higher than males in most of the product categories considered. Other observed gender differences, implications, and future research directions are discussed.

Resume

Cette recherche examine les differences entre les hommes et les femmes concernant la relation entre la connaissance subjective (SK), l'experience (EXP), et la difficulte d'evaluer dans la perception du produit (DE). Nous nous servons de donnees recueillies au cours d'une enquete pour tester les modeles d'equations structurelles des relations entre ces trois variables, et ce pour quatre categories de produits. Grace a l'analyse factorielle confirmatoire, nous montrons que l'EXP et la SK sont des concepts distincts mais correles. Notre etude nous permet de relever des differences notoires entre les hommes et les femmes. Pour les hommes, la relation entre l'EXP et la DE se fait par l'intermediaire de la SK. Pour les femmes, la DE est reliee directement et indirectement (via SK) a l'EXP. Pour la plupart des categories etudiees, la moyenne de la variable DE des femmes est superieure a celle des hommes. L'article se penche egalement sur d'autres differences entre les hommes et les femmes, sur les consequences de ces differences, et propose des pistes de recherche futures dans le domaine.

The factors that influence consumers' product evaluation processes have long been of interest to consumer researchers. Evaluation of alternatives and purchase decision represent steps three and four, respectively, of the widely accepted five-stage buyer decision model (Kotler, Armstrong, & Cunningham, 2002). Consumers often conduct information search activities prior to evaluating suitable alternatives (Alba, Hutchinson, & Lynch, 1991). Knowledge and experience are two variables that are thought to influence the manner by which consumers: (a) interpret information, and (b) evaluate alternatives (Alba & Hutchinson, 1987, Alba et al., 1991). The current research seeks to gain a greater understanding of the relationship between knowledge, experience, and the perceived difficulty of the product evaluation task, with a focus on one critical-and to date, overlooked-variable that may moderate this relationship: gender.

Whether as a biological or a sociocultural perspective, gender has been a major topic of research among psychologists, sociologists, and anthropologists alike for more than a century. In marketing, a small but growing amount of research has examined gender, undoubtedly due to its importance as a segmentation variable. Among a relatively small number of variables, gender is one that meets all four requirements for effective segmentation (Kotler et al., 2002; Darley & Smith, 1995): measurability (the size, purchasing power, and profiles of gender segments can be measured), accessibility (gender segments can be effectively reached and served), substantiality (gender segments are large enough to be profitable), and actionability (effective programs can be designed for attracting and serving male and female segments for many product and service classes). However, the topic remains gravely under-researched; many researchers have shied away from focussing on gender differences for a number of reasons, most notably, issue sensitivity (Eagly, 1987).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Knowledge-Experience-Evaluation Relationship: A Structural Equations Modeling Test of Gender Differences
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.