Caught in the Middle: The State Historic Preservation Office Role in Federal Regulations

By Snortland, J. Signe | Plains Anthropologist, November 1999 | Go to article overview

Caught in the Middle: The State Historic Preservation Office Role in Federal Regulations


Snortland, J. Signe, Plains Anthropologist


ABSTRACT

With the 1992 amendments to the National Historic Preservation Act and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act federal agencies and the State Historic Preservation Office are required to consult with Native American groups. Previously tribal consultation was often limited to a letter of notification sent to the respective tribal councils. Now spiritual leaders, nongovernmental groups, and interested tribal members play a more important role. Increasingly State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPOs) serve as clearinghouses or contact points to link federal agencies to these diverse interest groups. As such, the SHPOs find themselves caught in the middle, not only between the federal agency and the tribe, but also between traditional spiritual leaders and the tribal council. Examples of such challenges and possible solutions to the problem are explored in this paper

Keywords: preservation legislation, Tribal Historic Preservation Office, State Historic Preservation Office, consultation, traditional cultural property.

"Who the hell are you to tell us what to do on our own reservation?" I was asked this rather hostile-sounding question by a puzzled member of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) had just finished a meeting with the Standing Rock Sioux tribal council over the location of a proposed casino, which the developer wanted to construct adjacent to a sacred site. Because construction was to be on federal land, the Bureau of Indian Affairs was required under the National Historic Preservation Act to consult with the SHPO. Perhaps the bureaucrats in the meeting understood why the SHPO staff was on the reservation talking about federal regulations, but to the general public standing around the edges of the room waiting to express their opinions, our involvement was a mystery and an imposition.

Why were we there? I know there were many tense moments during that meeting when I wished I were anywhere else on the planet. We were there because the National Historic Preservation Act has, in many ways, deposited the SHPO in the middle of consultation among the responsible federal agency, tribes, interested parties, local governmental officials, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. We are the middlemen and often the scapegoat.

THE ROLE OF THE SHPO

The State Historic Preservation Officer, who oversees the SHPO staff, is appointed by the governor of each state. As a gubernatorial appointee, a SHPO has no job security and can face a lot of political pressure. No job qualifications are required for the head preservationist. For instance, in the early 1980s in North Dakota, Governor Allen Olson appointed a traveling Munsingware salesman to serve as the SHPO. Coordination was a problem because he lived in a city 200 miles away from the SHPO office and staff. Our current SHPO is a professional archeologist, but such credentials or expertise are not required by federal regulations. However, the office staff must be qualified in the fields of archeology, history, architectural history, and historical architecture (National Park Service n.d.).

The role of the SHPO is to serve as a central repository of preservation information and to provide local cultural resource expertise to federal agencies. In compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act, federal agencies are required to consult with the SHPO if a project is on federal lands or if it is federally funded or licensed. The purpose of the consultation is to identify cultural resources, evaluate those resources, and assess the effects of the project on resources eligible for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. We also assist in planning damage mitigation on projects that cannot avoid damaging significant properties.

With the 1992 amendments to the National Historic Preservation Act and the passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, federal agencies and the SHPO are required to include tribal governments and Native American groups in the consultation process.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Caught in the Middle: The State Historic Preservation Office Role in Federal Regulations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.