ADR in a Multicultural Political Setting: A Look at the U.N. Joint Appeals Boards

By Baldwin, C. Stephen | Dispute Resolution Journal, November 1999 | Go to article overview

ADR in a Multicultural Political Setting: A Look at the U.N. Joint Appeals Boards


Baldwin, C. Stephen, Dispute Resolution Journal


In this article, Stephen Baldwin focuses on the "internal law" system of the United Nations and., specifically, on the workings of the U.N. Administrative Law Unit (ALU) and the Joint Appeals Board (JAB). Baldwin's analysis of these dispute resolution bodies encompasses a number of aspects, from the procedural to the political and highlights how the U.N.'s "extraordinary diversity" imposes unique challenges on its dispute resolution process.

Most current discussion of the United Nations as an institution tends to focus on extremes. What we might call "youthful idealism" views occupy one end of the continuum and are colored by the Charter's ringing preamble and text and, perhaps, distant high-school class visits to the East River's soaring monolith. On the other extreme is the cynical western press text: that the U.N. is at best confused and weak, at worst venal, sinister, and darkly undemocratic.

The truth is that the U.N. functions, and functions quietly, humanely, and quite well, in a number of areas that largely receive favorable attention only by the Third World that benefits from them. In addition, capitalizing on, rather than suffering from, its enormous multicultural base, the United Nations has begun to lift itself a respectable level away from a lowest common denominator managerial style in a number of areas, beginning with handling its own internal affairs. One such area is its management of basic employer-employee relations.

The Joint Appeals Board (JAB) of the U.N. secretariat is only a part-but an essential part-of a complex system of administrative law and dispute resolution that governs employees at the U.N. Employer-employee relations of the U.N. must accommodate an extraordinary level of diversity:

... (O)ther (than a few manual workers recruited locally) employees of an international organization-those carrying out clerical, executive or administrative duties, and variously, described as officials, agents, staff members, members of the Secretariat, etc-are not subject to any municipal system of law. International administrative tribunals, which have been set up to judge disputes between them and the organizations, have almost invariably held that they are subject to the internal law of the organization.1

This article describes the "internal law" system and focuses on the central role of the JAB.

In accordance with the organization's large, complex, and constantly-changing staff rules, administrative decisions that affect staff members in various ways are delegated to and made by representatives of its chief administrator, the secretary general.

When a staff member wishes to contest or appeal a particular decision, his or her first recourse is to request review, in writing, within two months of receiving notification of the decision in question.2 This request, which is directed to the secretary general, normally goes to a small (currently three-lawyer) office called the Administrative Law Unit (ALU), which may have jurisdiction over upward of 300 cases a year, worldwide, since its jurisdiction extends well beyond the New York headquarters.

At this stage, every effort is made to settle the issue by means other than proceeding to the next formal step-submission of a formal filing of appeal to the Joint Appeals Board (JAB); perhaps 100 cases actually proceed to the JAB stage.3 Very recently, however-beginning in approximately mid-to-late 1997-a "new climate" arose within the entire administration of justice. This new environment, featuring an "open-door" approach to dealing with disputes or potential disputes even before they become susceptible of mediation, has already resulted in a 40% reduction of disputes in 1998.4

The ALU has a number of ways to effect resolution of conflict at its early stage, limited only (but significantly) by:

a) a statutory inability to make financial decisions directly;

b) the small size of its staff; and

c) the imagination, energy, and goodwill not only of its own staff, but those of other offices with which it must deal in these efforts. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

ADR in a Multicultural Political Setting: A Look at the U.N. Joint Appeals Boards
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.