Shattering the Myths: Women in Academe

By Gray, Mary W. | Academe, January/February 2000 | Go to article overview

Shattering the Myths: Women in Academe


Gray, Mary W., Academe


Shattering the Myths: Women in Academe

Judith Glazer-Raymo. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999, 200 pp., $38

MARY W. GRAY

THE MYTH THAT GLAZER-RAYMO seeks to shatter is that women have made great progress in academe. But when we consider the status of women in academe, we may confront not so much a myth as a glass half empty or half full. On the positive side, there have been enormous increases over the past thirty years in the numbers of women enrolling in graduate and professional schools (with exceptions in some scientific and technological fields); the rising numbers in medical and law schools are particularly noteworthy. For entry-level faculty positions, women are being hired at rates approximating their availability.

On the negative side, there are few women full professors in the country's most prestigious universities and few women presidents or deans of professional schools. In nearly all institutions, women are underrepresented at the upper faculty ranks and among the most highly paid professors. Although nearly every month women win substantial financial awards through litigation to remedy years of discriminatory pay and harassment, many are unable to achieve remedies in the courts, and the pattern of discriminatory treatment continues.

Glazer-Raymo announces that she intends to examine the causes of women's lack of progress in entering higher academic ranks, but she offers little analysis or insight. The suggestion that universities and disciplines must be reorganized to conform to a vaguely expressed feminist model seems not only unrealistic but also ill advised. In particular, the notion that 11 equal opportunity and merit pay are contradictory remedies" is anathema to those women faculty members who think that women are not inherently less meritorious than men. It is analogous to the theme expounded by feminist critics of science, who are not scientists themselves and who have little understanding of the field, but who nonetheless insist that science must somehow change its fundamental nature if women are to succeed as scientists. Glazer-Raymo, a professor of education at the C. W. Post campus of Long Island University, writes from a personal perspective, having entered academe relatively late in life after years in local school-board politics.

She has assembled statistics about women faculty members from many sources, including Academe. While it is convenient to have this information in one place, it would have been more useful had the data been integrated to portray the overall situation of women faculty members, or at least been put into similar formats for purposes of comparison; the latter problem is particularly acute in the chapter on women in the professions. Also, one would expect to see data more recent than those included in the book, given that it was published in 1999.

Glazer-Raymo's skepticism about internal mechanisms meant to improve the status of women in academe is well founded. Affirmative action or equal-employment-opportunity officials all too often see their role as protecting the institution, not helping women and minorities. Commissions on women have frequently been denied access to relevant data; when they get the information and produce thorough analyses and recommendations, their reports are often ignored. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Shattering the Myths: Women in Academe
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.