Alexander Hamilton and the Abolition of Slavery in New York

By Weston, Rob N. | Afro-Americans in New York Life and History, January 31, 1994 | Go to article overview

Alexander Hamilton and the Abolition of Slavery in New York


Weston, Rob N., Afro-Americans in New York Life and History


Alexander Hamilton and the Abolition of Slavery in New York

A group of persons belonging to the monied aristocracy gathered in dimly lit meeting hall on the edge of New York City in the late 1790s. Many of them were conservative bankers, lawyers, businessmen, and politicians who enjoyed high social status after the recent war for independence from Great Britain. The meeting was not all that it seemed. These gentlemen, donned in white-topped boots and powdered wigs, were not discussing shares in the newly incorporated National Bank, the lucrative fur trade, or even who won the last duel. Instead, they assembled to display their indignation over slavery. One member told of a master who brutally beat his female house servant. Another argued against New Yorkers capturing and selling free blacks to the West Indies or the American South. The meeting ended with each member signing a petition to the state legislature calling for the gradual abolition of slavery in New York. Yet, as they entered their houses later that same evening, many of these abolitionists were greeted by slaves, who took their overcoats, brought them a tanker of Madeira, and shined their buckled shoes.

Alexander Hamilton was not only a member of the group but an officer in the Society for the Promotion of the Manumission of Slaves, and he too was not all that he seemed. By today's standards, Hamilton was an arch-conservative. At the Constitutional Convention, Hamilton supported an elected monarchy with strong emphasis on rule by the rich and powerful. One of his biographers describes him: "Hamilton made no secret of his belief in the advantages of an aristocratic power in the common-wealth, or of his reasons for that belief.(2) One may wonder why Hamilton joined a society that threatened the understood social and racial caste system of the era? After further examination, another question arises as well. What kind of abolitionist was Hamilton if he owned slaves?

Closer analysis shows that Hamilton was at best ambivalent about the abolition of slavery. Unlike his enemy and fellow slaveowner, Thomas Jefferson, Hamilton never clearly, sincerely, or eloquently denounced slavery in his personal or private works, despite his membership in the Manumission Society. Hamilton's wavering on this issue is not typical of how he faced other challenges, like the National Bank, and this suggests that his heart was not into the cause. His inconsistent stance towards slavery most likely stemmed from his desire to be accepted in the Manhattan merchant elite, which viewed the ownership of slaves as a status symbol. This essay will argue that Hamilton thought about the issue of slavery and determined it was wrong, but he found it too convenient an institution to exterminate from his private life.

Some scholars, especially Shane White, argue that Hamilton and his high society friends sought the end of slavery to distinguish themselves from the "middling sort," who began owning more slaves toward the end of the eighteenth century. Although it is true that up-and-coming merchants did acquire more slaves in the late 1790s, the argument that their ownership was the force behind abolition is not convincing. The number of slaves held by the merchant class increased partially due to an increase in the number of merchants in New York City during this time period. In a ten year period from 1790 to 1800, the number of merchants expanded from 284 to 1,102.(3) The increase in merchants reflects the economic expansion of the period. The renewed prosperity of the late 1790s allowed many who were upwardly mobile to close their shops and become merchants. These new merchants used their extra income to demonstrate their improved status by purchasing slaves. As a result of this increase, the share of all male slaveholders increased from 21.9 percent in 1790 to 35.7 percent in 1800.(4)

Yet it appears unlikely that that the increase in the number of merchant slaveowners was the main reason Hamilton and the other monied aristocrats joined the Manumission Society.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Alexander Hamilton and the Abolition of Slavery in New York
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.