Review Essay: Retheorizing the Holocaust; History and Memory after Auschwitz, by Dominick LaCapra

By B, Paul | Shofar, January 31, 2000 | Go to article overview

Review Essay: Retheorizing the Holocaust; History and Memory after Auschwitz, by Dominick LaCapra


B, Paul, Shofar


Review Essay: Retheorizing the Holocaust; History and Memory after Auschwitz, by Dominick LaCapra

Holocaust studies is difficult to define. It has, of course, a unifying referent: the Holocaust. But its constitutive feature seems to lie elsewhere. After all, historical analyses of the Holocaust's causes often do not belong in the disciplinary category Holocaust studies. Nor is methodology its characteristic component. For Holocaust studies includes a variety of perspectives: philosophical, historical, sociological, literary critical, psychological. What, then, gives Holocaust studies its sense of coherence? Perhaps all the disparate intellectual undertakings that comprise it are bound together by their shared concern with questions of representation. Indeed, Holocaust studies has focused on the theoretical problems with which historians of the Holocaust must reckon, and on public and aesthetic processes of remembering trauma and memorializing catastrophe, as well as on the connections between historiographical problems and public remembrance. Holocaust studies takes place at the intersection of history and memory.

For the moment, however, it might be more appropriate to claim that Holocaust studies should take place at the intersection of history and memory. At least this is the point Dominick LaCapra pushes in his thoughtful and compactly written new book, History and Memory after Auschwitz. LaCapra argues that practitioners of Holocaust studies have been largely unsuccessful in their attempt to establish a kind of symbiotic relationship between history and memory, and that the project of sustaining a difficult tension between history and memory is worth pursuing. Why is this project so compelling? LaCapra's contention is that it is both theoretically satisfying and socially productive. Accordingly, three of his six chapters deal with the recondite historiographical challenges posed by "the limit-case" of the Holocaust; the other three assess the effectiveness of prominent aesthetic attempts at Holocaust remembrance: Camus's The Fall, Claude Lanzmann's Shoah, and Art Spiegelman's Maus.

LaCapra is clearly the right man for this difficult job. He holds a chair of Humanities at Cornell University and is an eminent European intellectual historian, best known, perhaps for his long-standing and intense critical engagement with contemporary trends in historiography (See, for example, his History and Criticism, 1987). LaCapra has also managed to straddle disciplinary divides, mobilizing his theoretical acumen to play a key role in high-profile discussions of literary theory. And his readings of cultural phenomena, fiction, and film exhibit an easy familiarity with sophisticated techniques of textual analysis. Moreover, LaCapra has written extensively on the Holocaust. His Representing the Holocaust: History, Theory, Trauma (1994) is one of the founding texts of Holocaust studies. And so his meta-reflection on Holocaust studies is also a kind of poignant exercise in self-reflection. Indeed, he refers to his own work often and, at times, rather critically.

But his most pointed criticisms are reserved for other theoreticians of the Holocaust. In his eponymous first chapter, for example, he pours opprobrium on both historians who try to separate history and memory cleanly and historians who would collapse the distinction between history and memory. Meanwhile, LaCapra himself tries to chart a course between the Scylla of strict division and the Charybdis of conflation. LaCapra objects, for example, to Charles E. Maier's disparaging remarks about the lively interest in memory in contemporary culture, both high and low. Memory in general, and the process of remembering the Holocaust in particular, may have become a privileged object of journalistic, artistic, and pop-cultural attention. And some of this attention may be opportunistic (the "Shoah business," as it has been called) and even obsessive (a narrow identity politics which appropriates the legacy of victimization as the seat of identity). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Review Essay: Retheorizing the Holocaust; History and Memory after Auschwitz, by Dominick LaCapra
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.