Landlord Satisfaction with Arkansas Agricultural Land Agreements

By Rainey, Ronald L.; Dixon, Bruce L. et al. | Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, December 2003 | Go to article overview

Landlord Satisfaction with Arkansas Agricultural Land Agreements


Rainey, Ronald L., Dixon, Bruce L., Parsch, Lucas D., Ahrendsen, Bruce L., Bierlen, Ralph W., Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics


Landlord satisfaction levels with agricultural land-leasing agreements are examined with a 1998 sample of Arkansas landowners. Ordered probit models are estimated identifying which factors significantly affect satisfaction levels. Results indicate that the type of lease is not a significant determinant of landlord satisfaction levels. Proportion of landlord's income from leasing, tenant educational background, social capital variables, presence of irrigation equipment, and perceptions about the FAIR Act were found to significantly affect lease satisfaction in at least one of the three satisfaction models estimated. A comparison with an earlier study of Arkansas tenants indicates landlords have generally higher satisfaction levels.

Key Words: cropland contracts, landlord satisfaction, leasing, probit models

JEL Classifications: L14, Q12, Q24

Although leasing plays an important role in the structure of U.S. agriculture, the U.S. land leasing literature lacks extensive empirical analysis at the lease level, as noted by Bierlen and Parsch. Most existing research using U.S. data focuses on leasing contract design and the motivations for using specific leasing arrangements. Empirical analyses of U.S. leasing include Alien and Lueck (1992, 1993), Bierlen et al., Brown and Atkinson, and Gwilliam. The scarcity of studies at the lease level is likely due to a lack of good lease-level data. Lease-level data are difficult to collect because of the private nature of the agreements and the highly localised markets within which they are negotiated. Also, Rainey et al. note the potential unwillingness of tenants and landlords to release proprietary information and the reluctance of data-collecting agencies to overburden potential respondents with numerous or long surveys.

The extent and continuation of leasing as an institution depend on adequate tenant and landlord satisfaction with leasing. A major shortcoming of most empirical leasing behavior studies that use data from individual leases is the lack of data about the landlord. Typically, data are gathered from tenants about their farming operation and personal characteristics. The landlords are not interviewed, and the only information gathered about them is through the tenant, which clearly could be subject to bias or simple ignorance. As the landowner and the second party in the lease, landlords are an important component in the leasing process.

Landlord satisfaction is important. In perfect markets, one would expect landlords to be satisfied because they can do no better than their present arrangement. However, land markets are local in nature and information about rental prices and land supply can be hard to obtain (Barry et al.). Lessees might be few. In addition, landlords can be distant from the property and not possess much knowledge about the parcel or agriculture in general. Information asymmetries between landlord and tenant might be present. Hence, dissatisfaction could arise and presage changes in contract type, terms, or ownership of the parcel. The objective of this study is to identify the determinants of landlord satisfaction. In particular, the question of whether lease terms or other factors are the more important determinants of satisfaction is explored.

An ideal sample would consist of data on both landlord and tenant for a given parcel. However, such data would be very difficult to gather because both parties would have to consent. In this study, data are obtained from a mail and telephone survey of landlords leasing land in Arkansas. As such, the sample provides a complementary study to that of Bierlen and Parsch, who used tenant data. However, the two samples are from distinctly different points in time (1998 versus 1991 in Bierlen and Parsch) and are not for the same parcels as in the prior study. The policy settings between the 1991 sample and the 1998 sample are quite different, too. The 1991 sample was for a policy regime characterized by target prices and deficiency payments. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Landlord Satisfaction with Arkansas Agricultural Land Agreements
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.