The "Acceptability" of Race/Gender/Sexuality-Based Discrimination in Democratic Schools

By Kumashiro, Kevin | Transformations, Spring 2003 | Go to article overview

The "Acceptability" of Race/Gender/Sexuality-Based Discrimination in Democratic Schools


Kumashiro, Kevin, Transformations


Since the end of the Civil War, the U.S. Constitution has made it quite explicit that equality is central to a democratic society. As stated in the "equal protection clause" of the Fourteenth Amendment, "No state shall...deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." In the time since, the U.S. Supreme Court and Congress have extended the equal protection clause to racially marginalized groups in schools, such as by prohibiting some forms of segregation (Brown v. Board of Education, 1954) and discrimination: "No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance" (Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IV). The U.S. Congress has also prohibited some forms of discrimination in schools based on gender/sex: "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance" (Education Amendments of 1972, Title IX). The U.S. Congress even legislates equality in schools at the state level: "No State shall deny equal educational opportunity to an individual on account of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin" (Equal Education Opportunity Act of 1974). Legally and ideally, members of "democratic" schools should be able to enjoy equal protection of the laws and freedom from discrimination.

However, educational research has long illustrated and continues to illustrate ways in which inequities exist in schools, and ways in which many groups are not equally protected from discrimination (Kumashiro, 2000b). Research has also noted that many school personnel often seem unwilling or unable to recognize and address these inequities and forms of discrimination (Kumashiro, 2000a). Such individuals disagree with the notion that the status quo of schools is oppressive, and instead assume that it is a level playing field, neutral, and equal. They insist that attempts to establish equality -- such as affirmative action -- bestow on some in society privileges not already enjoyed by the mainstream, and thus, are antithetical to a democracy. Discrimination, according to this view, is not already in play, and results only from observable, individualized acts that deviate from the supposedly neutral norm.

The U.S. Supreme Court has complicated such definitions of discrimination in schools in at least two ways. First, along with actions, discrimination can result from inaction or the failure to act:

...recipients of federal funding [such as schools] may be liable for `subject[ing]' their students to discrimination where the recipient is deliberately indifferent to known acts of student-on-student sexual harassment and the harasser is under the school's disciplinary authority. (Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, 1999)

Schools can be held liable for violating federal civil rights laws if they knowingly and willfully ignore sexual harassment of one student by another. Second, the Court tells us that, along with deviations from the norm, discrimination can result from normal, everyday practices, and this can happen in at least two ways. Discriminatory practices can involve treating different groups differently, such as when requiring students from different racial groups to attend separate schools, which historically have been unequal (Brown v. Board of Education, 1954). Discriminatory practices can also involve treating different groups the same, such as when not taking affirmative steps to enable students with limited English-language proficiency to participate meaningfully in schools (Lau v. Nichols, 1974). Schools can be held liable for violating federal civil rights laws if they fail to change a status quo that itself is racially unequal. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The "Acceptability" of Race/Gender/Sexuality-Based Discrimination in Democratic Schools
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.