Seeing through Art: A Course on Images of Women and Men in Western Art

By Witcombe, Christopher L. C. E. | Transformations, March 31, 1995 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Seeing through Art: A Course on Images of Women and Men in Western Art

Witcombe, Christopher L. C. E., Transformations

Seeing Through Art: A Course on Images of Women and Men in Western Art

Two years ago I decided to drop all my courses and start again from scratch. I became very frustrated with traditional approaches in the teaching of art history and increasingly troubled by the narrow and self-indulgent concerns of the discipline. I decided to teach courses that would provide my students with knowledge and skills that had relevance outside the classroom and academia, and that would serve them not only in intellectual ways but would also have meaning and application in the real world in which they lived.

Despite significant shifts in the discipline in recent years, there has been little change in the structure of art historical pedagogy at the undergraduate level. Almost without exception, the curriculum in most colleges and universities remains filled with historical surveys of art history, usually offered in the context of an era (Medieval Art, Renaissance Art, etc.) and/or nation (Greek Art, Italian Renaissance, etc.), that exhibit little interest in issues that fall outside what is regarded as the art historians' principal tasks: identifying artists and their works, identifying subject matter and conventional meaning, identifying personal, regional, national, and period styles, and the dating and placing of works of art as neatly as possible within the developmental continuum of an artist's oeuvre (or a regional school, or national, or period style) and within the stylistic continuum of the history of art. Although the ostensible results of these tasks is the history of art we teach our undergraduates, the practice, in fact, caters more to the needs of the museum and the marketplace and provides the student with only a very narrow understanding of art. I felt my students digested a lot of art history but learned very little about art in history.

One of the major problems with the discipline of art history, as I see it, is its self-referential character. A work of art may have historical significance, but for the art historian, its importance (and this is apart from the problematic issue of quality) is gauged principally through its relationship to other works of art. A work of art acquires art historical status according to the degree to which it derives from, or sums up, or challenges earlier stylistic developments, and the extent to which it lays the stylistic foundations for the next step, artist, or period. There has been developed thereby the illusion of a history of art composed along one great thread of stylistic interconnection. The system allowed works of art to be connected forwards and backwards through history by means of a perceived logic of development. The history of art has been made to unfold largely in reference to itself. In order to do this, the machinery of the discipline effectively removes the work of art from its historical context and, except in the most general terms, denies it the role of historical document. The reasons for this lie at the roots of the modern discipline of art history in the 19th century. 1

From the beginning art history was permeated by the philosophies of Kant, Schiller, and Hegel. As Margaret Iverson explains:

These philosophies celebrated the formative activity of mind in shaping our experience, and conceived the view that works of art either embody a universal characteristic of mind, or bear traces of a particular stage of human spiritual development. This conception of the nature of art led to an interest in those aspects of art which transcend the merely literal. Not the object depicted, but the form or style of depiction was regarded as the mind's own contribution and, for that very reason, was thought to be the essentially artistic element. The way a thing is represented became the salient factor. 2

Both Heinrich Wolfflin and Alois Riegl (two "fathers" of art history) regarded stylistic or formal characteristics as the fundamental and essential elements of art, and, moreover, as constituting a system or structure by which they could impose a rational order on art.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Seeing through Art: A Course on Images of Women and Men in Western Art


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?