The Critical Shapes of Body Image: The Role of Culture and Family in the Production of Eating Disorders

By Haworth-Hoeppner, Susan | Journal of Marriage and Family, February 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Critical Shapes of Body Image: The Role of Culture and Family in the Production of Eating Disorders


Haworth-Hoeppner, Susan, Journal of Marriage and Family


Although research has pointed to the influence of culture and family in the etiology of eating disorders, few studies have examined how these influences conjoin in this process. This research explores how the family mediates cultural ideas about thinness and how the family conveys these messages to family members. Using a grounded theory approach, open-ended interviews were conducted with 32 White, middle-class women (with and without eating disorders) on the topic of body image and eating problems. In conjunction with this method, qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was also performed to identify family characteristics, and their specific combinations, that were associated with eating disorders. The findings indicate that a critical family environment, coercive parental control, and a dominating discourse on weight in the household are salient conditions, and their specific configurations are discussed in relationship to current theoretical conceptualizations regarding the influences of culture and family in the production of eating disorders.

Key Words: body image, eating disorders, family dynamics, sociocultural influences.

I think it's real societal driven. And you can't help as you grow up, you know, having it passed on, whether your parents intend to do it or not. I'm sure I've done it with my kids to some degree (Manna).

In recent years, a growing body of literature has addressed the relationship between body image and the development of eating disorders (Bordo, 1993; Dolan, 1994; Garner & Garfinkel, 1980; Garner & Kearney-Cooke, 1996; Garner, Garfinkel, Schwartz, & Thompson, 1980; Johnson, Brems, & Fischer, 1996; Mahbobah, 1992; Moorey, 1991; Ogletree, Williams, Raffeld, Mason, & Fricke, 1990; Saukko, 1996; Taub & McLorg, 1994; Thompson, 1994; Way, 1995; Wiseman, Gray, Mosimann, & Ahrens, 1992). Competing explanations of how to theorize the etiology of eating disorders has emerged from this research. Two prominent perspectives within this debate implicate either the influences of culture or those of the family.

Proponents of cultural influence cite the higher prevalence rates of eating disorders such as anorexia or bulimia in Western culture (Garfinkel & Garner, 1982), among Whites (Hsu, 1987), and particularly among women (Gordon, 1990). They point to the disproportionate number of women with these disorders who are associated with occupational or professional fields (e.g., modeling, gymnastics, ballet) that place a high value on slenderness (Garfinkel & Garner, 1982; le Grange, Tibbs, & Noakes, 1994; Williamson et al., 1995). Furthermore, they underscore the power of cultural standards of beauty that emphasize slenderness as a key feature of feminine identity (SteinerAdair, 1986; Striegel-Moore, 1993), so that even women without eating disorders experience body dissatisfaction (Cohn & Adler 1992; Davies & Furnham, 1986; Pliner, Chaiken, & Flett, 1990; Turner, Hamilton, Jacobs, Angood, & Hovd Dwyer, 1997); and that dissatisfaction is pervasive enough to have been characterized as a "normative discontent" (Rodin, Silberstein, & StriegelMoore, 1985).

Proponents of a family perspective offer a different approach to studying eating disorders. They contend that individuals develop a normal or distorted body image in the context of family life; therefore, family influences should be the focus of investigation (Bruch, 1978; Foulkes, 1996; Johnson et al., 1996; Keel, Heatherton, & Harnden, 1997; Leung, Schwartzman, & Steiger, 1996; Rieves & Cash, 1996; Root, Fallon, & Friedrich, 1986). Some of these researchers even critique the cultural approach, arguing that although all women are exposed to cultural standards of beauty that might be linked to a "normative discontent," not all women develop eating disorders (Brumberg, 1988). But these two sets of research findingsone emphasizing cultural influences and the other family origins-represent a false dichotomy regarding the social etiology of eating disorders, because of a theoretical miscasting of the relationship between culture and family.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Critical Shapes of Body Image: The Role of Culture and Family in the Production of Eating Disorders
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?