Ethnicity and Special Education Research: Identifying Questions and Methods

By Coutinho, Martha J.; Oswald, Donald P. | Behavioral Disorders, November 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Ethnicity and Special Education Research: Identifying Questions and Methods


Coutinho, Martha J., Oswald, Donald P., Behavioral Disorders


ABSTRACT- This article presents questions, offers ideas, and solicits input regarding hypotheses and methodologies needed to extend our understanding of the ethnic representation of students identified as having serious emotional disturbance (SED). Technical methods are discussed to ensure that estimates of the extent of disproportionate representation are accurate, technically defensible, and interpretable for purposes of further research and policy decisions. Research questions and analyses needed to produce a better conceptual understanding of why disproportionality occurs are explored. Societal issues are described that influence definitions, methods, and interpretations and will continue to influence capacity to respond to the problem of disproportionate ethnic representation of students with SED.

There is enormous state-by-state variation in the percentages of students with SED served under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA, P.L. 105-17, as amended) and a substantial gap between estimates of the prevalence of SED and the actual number of students served (Oswald & Coutinho, 1995). Parents, teachers, mental health professionals, and policymakers continue to disagree about what represents serious emotional disturbance, one consequence of which is varied eligibility requirements across programs. Because IDEA is an education law, in order to be identified as a student with SED a child must demonstrate serious and ongoing behavioral or emotional problems and fail to make adequate academic progress. Unless there is a substantial impact on the child's educational performance, there is no disability under IDEA. This requirement, as well as the stigma and ambiguity associated with SED and other definitions (Reschly, 1995), can allow differences related to the individual (e.g., culture, ethnicity, socioeconomic status) or to the sociocultural beliefs of educators, evaluators, and parents to influence inappropriately who is identified as having SED in a particular community. When this occurs, the likelihood increases that a child will be misidentified or provided with an inappropriate education.

The importance to the public of preventing the potential for harm to a child who is misidentified or served inappropriately is evident in the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the procedures for evaluating children suspected of a disability under IDEA, the data collection and monitoring responsibilities of the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR), and court decisions spanning more than 20 years. Unfortunately, public concern remains that although America's student body is becoming more and more diverse, children who are nonwhite, non-native-English-speaking, or poor continue to be overidentified as having disabilities and to be served in more segregated placements than their peers (Artiles & Trent, 1994). The recent amendments to IDEA (P.L. 105-17) expand requirements to report and correct inappropriate identification, placement, or service patterns. In general, research has supported public concern, but the picture is unclear because studies have varied so much with respect to definitions of minority representation, findings across ethnic groups, and technical methods.

Obtaining Accurate and Defensible Estimates of Disproportionality

Considerable research has documented the overrepresentation of African-American students in special education (Carlson, Hirschorn, Ryaboy, & Zhao, 1996; Chin & Hughes, 1987; Coulter, 1996; Harry, 1992, 1994; Reschley, 1991; Reschley & Ward, 1991; Serwatka, Derring, & Grant, 1995), in particular as having SED or mild mental retardation (MMR). Many different definitions of the problem and various methods have been employed to investigate disproportionate representation, limiting the interpretation and generality of findings because of varying samples, unclear or questionable assumptions about disproportional ity, and inadequate technical methods.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Ethnicity and Special Education Research: Identifying Questions and Methods
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?