New U.S. Foreign Aid Agreement Provides Israel a Net Increase in U.S. Foreign Aid

By L, Shawn | Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, August 1998 | Go to article overview

New U.S. Foreign Aid Agreement Provides Israel a Net Increase in U.S. Foreign Aid


L, Shawn, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs


New U.S. Foreign Aid Agreement Provides Israel a Net Increase in U.S. Foreign Aid

U.S. State Department, Pentagon and Israeli officials reached a tentative agreement in May to phase out U.S. economic aid to Israel gradually over 10 years, while simultaneously increasing U.S. military aid. Under the agreement worked out by negotiating teams led by Israel's Finance Minister Ya'acov Neeman and U.S. Undersecretary of State for Economic and Business affairs Stuart Eizenstat, starting in fiscal year 1999 (which begins Oct. 1, 1998) the United States will reduce its annual $1.2 billion in economic aid to Israel by $120 million each year until the program ends in 2007.

During that same period, the United States will increase its annual $1.8 billion in grant military aid to Israel by $60 million annually until it reaches an annual total of $2.4 billion in fiscal year 2008.

A significant sticking point in the negotiations was how much of its military aid grant Israel will be allowed to spend in-country on purchases of Israeli-made defense items. Unlike any other country receiving U.S. military aid -- the intent of which normally is to subsidize American defense companies and create jobs in the United States -- Israel presently is allowed to spend $475 million of its annual $1.8 billion in U.S. military aid on Israeli-made defense items.

Israeli officials initially hoped to spend all of the additional military aid from the United States in Israel, a suggestion that was flatly refused by U.S. officials, including Assistant Secretary of State for Near East Affairs Martin Indyk. Indyk, former U.S. ambassador to Israel, described the Israeli demands as a "very problematic issue," according to the Jerusalem Post.

"U.S. defense contractors want the business and that's understandable," Indyk said. "The Congress and administration want the business to go to American companies, so that's one [issue] that people should understand is very difficult for us."

Finance Minister Neeman later said that Israel would settle for spending 40 percent of the additional aid in Israel -- in addition to the $475 million -- a suggestion that also was refused.

The eventual settlement, according to the U.S. trade weekly Defense News, was that Israel will be allowed to spend 25 percent of the additional aid on Israeli-produced or co-produced defense items. That will result in an additional $15 million windfall each year for Israeli defense companies until the total amount of U.S. aid Israel is allowed to spend annually on Israeli-produced or coproduced military hardware reaches $625 million in 2008.

In the past and at present, this annual infusion of U.S. aid directly into Israel's numerous defense industries has helped them compete for and win lucrative international and American defense contracts, often at the expense of American defense companies. Israeli companies currently are competing against U.S. firms for more than a dozen large contracts worth billions of dollars and thousands of jobs.

One example of this competition is for an estimated $5 billion contract from Turkey for 1,000 main battle tanks. Competing against the M1 Abrams tanks made by General Dynamics Land Systems is Israel's Merkava main battle tank. In fiscal year 1977 Israel asked for and received a "onetime only" provision to spend $107 million in U.S. military aid in Israel to build the Merkava. Since 1977, Congress has allowed Israel to spend more than $5 billion in U.S. military aid in Israel on weapons systems like the Merkava, a massive subsidy which routinely creates competition for American-made military hardware.

One important question that remains conspicuously unanswered is how Israel will repay its outstanding financial debts to the United States government. Attached to every foreign aid bill since 1984 has been the Cranston Amendment, named after its Senate sponsor, California Democrat Alan Cranston, that compels the U.S. government to give Israel enough economic aid to pay the interest and principal due each year on its debts to the U. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

New U.S. Foreign Aid Agreement Provides Israel a Net Increase in U.S. Foreign Aid
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.