Congress to Consider 'Code of Conduct' for U.S. Arms Transfe

Arms Control Today, March 1994 | Go to article overview

Congress to Consider 'Code of Conduct' for U.S. Arms Transfe


Over the years, Congress has compiled a poor record in using its authority to shape U.S. arms export policy. In February, however, Senator Mark Hatfield (R-OR) and Representative Cynthia McKinney (D-GA) took a major step to change that by introducing legislation designed to expand congressional responsibility for, and authority over, U.S. arms transfers.

The "Code of Conduct for Arms Transfers Act of 1993," introduced at a news conference on February 1, marks the first legislative effort in a decade to broaden the authority of Congress to check executive branch decisions concerning U.S. weapons exports and military aid.

The code would require states to meet certain minimum criteria in their domestic and international practices in order to be eligible to receive U.S. military assistance or weapons. Countries failing to meet these standards (see box, below) could be eligible, but only if the president determines that a waiver is in the "national security interest" of the United States and Congress "enacts a law approving such exemption request." As co-sponsor McKinney puts it, the legislation "works as a sort of International Brady Bill," requiring that a country be pre-screened before it is eligible to receive weapons or military aid.

The four criteria established by the code essentially build on standards of international behavior the Clinton administration has identified as the major goals of its foreign policy. Under the legislation, U.S. arms transfers and assistance "may not be provided" to any foreign government that lacks democratic institutions, fails to respect human rights, is engaged in "acts of armed aggression" in violation of international law, and is not fully participating in the UN Register of Conventional Arms.

The major innovation of the legislation is that rather than attempting to impose an across-the-board ban on exports to certain countries, it gives the executive branch and Congress the opportunity-and the obligation--to explain their reasons for proposing transfers to controversial recipients.

HOW IT WOULD WORK

While the proposed legislation does not specify a timetable for reviewing a country's eligibility, a typical arms export approval process under the provisions of the code might work as follows: Each year at budget time, a president would submit two country lists. The first would comprise those countries the president certifies as automatically eligible to receive U.S. weapons and aid because they met the criteria established by the code. The second would include those countries that failed to meet the code's four standards, but which the president determines should nonetheless be eligible because it is in the national security interest of the United States.

Congress would then schedule hearings to review all requests for country exemptions. (The bill does not require hearings, but recommends them in non binding "sense of the Congress" language.) These hearings would provide a forum in which the human rights conditions and arms control practices of prospective recipient states could be openly debated by official and non-governmental specialists. Congress would then vote to approve or reject the president's proposed waivers by a simple majority of both houses.

Finally, when a particular sale is proposed, the existing requirements of the Arms Export Control Act would continue to apply. Under those provisions, the president must give Congress advance notification of proposed arms transfers. Congress can reject proposed exports with a two thirds majority vote by both houses.

THE CODE'S IMPROVEMENTS

The Hatfield-McKinney bill would make four major improvements in the current system of congressional oversight.

First, because it requires an affirmative vote to sustain a presidential waiver, the legislation forces Congress to face up to its responsibility in this increasingly important area of foreign policy. Congress is not now required to vote when a president proposes an arms sale, and, as a result, legislators--including those with defense industries in their home states--have opted to leave these controversial national security decisions up to the president. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Congress to Consider 'Code of Conduct' for U.S. Arms Transfe
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.