Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

Ripples of Battle: How Wars of the Past Still Determine How We Fight, How We Live, and How We Think

By Fromm, Peter D. | Army, January 2004 | Go to article overview

Ripples of Battle: How Wars of the Past Still Determine How We Fight, How We Live, and How We Think


Fromm, Peter D., Army


Ripples of Battle: How Wars of the Past Still Determine How We Fight, How We Live, and How We Think. Victor Davis Hanson. Doubleday. 278 pages; photographs; maps; index; bibliography; $27.50.

'Fascinating Reading'

Three Great Battles That Shaped the Western World

Ripples of Battle by Victor Davis Hanson is a series of three extended essays that show how people and events connected to a trio of disparate battles effected momentous ramifications for the Western world. Battle, Hanson says, transforms history like nothing else because it compresses the timelines of human ability and chance and allows indiscriminate fate to level human achievement, elevating some and destroying others. The best among us are often the ones who die in the fighting. The battles he discusses are Okinawa in the spring of 1945, Shiloh in April 1862, and Delium in November 424 B.C. These three battles, according to Hanson, have shaped the development of Western thought, American culture and more particularly, the American way of fighting wars. All three have therefore conditioned America's response to the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Hanson's approach argues against the idea that individuals make little or no difference in the sweep of history. On the contrary, Hanson makes a strong case that the deeds, experiences, deaths and survivals born of battles create waves of vast cultural, political and economic significance. The experiences of individuals involved in these three battles in particular have precipitated immeasurable consequences for the modern world.

The first part of the book describes how the slow grind of head-on fighting on Okinawa led to the nuclear attack on Hiroshima, how a strategy of intentional sacrifice aimed at destroying as many Americans as possible in hope of a negotiated armistice backfired on Japan. It is compelling reading.

Hanson's discerning analysis reveals deep psychological and ideological influences resulting from the fighting there, making an implied ethical argument. Hanson suggests that the contemporary moral debates surrounding Hiroshima and Nagasaki have lost sight of the horrific killing on Okinawa, a battle whose actual facts no one seems to want to remember. His analysis is reminiscent of the exchange of essays between Michael Walzer and Paul Fussell, most notably Fussell's rejoinder, "Thank God for the Atom Bomb." Hanson is firmly in the camp of Fussell in assuming that the use of terror bombings against Japan can be somehow separated from the larger ethical question of an American imposed unconditional surrender.

Diving into the historical facts of the ruthless, bloody nature of the battle for Okinawa reveals how and why America could use atomic weapons against innocent noncombatants in 1945. The implied moral argument urges that the number of lives ostensibly saved by Japanese surrender in the wake of employing atomic weapons justified their use. Hanson uses references to E.B. Sledge's With the Old Breed to underscore the moral point of the horror of Okinawa and the anticipation of even more extensive horror on the Japanese home islands. This explicit historical argument impresses itself on the reader with absolute clarity.

The ripples of this battle in American culture led to a series of unfortunate assumptions, among them wrongheaded American analogies to conducting the later wars in Korea and Vietnam. One of the unfortunate assumptions Americans took from the Okinawa experience was an attitude long held to be a truism in the West: "After the startling array of suicides on Okinawa, Americans were convinced that Asians in general did not value life-theirs or anyone else's-in the same manner as Westerners." That attitude grew out of the Japanese strategy of fighting to the death and of using the civilian population as much as possible. The result was horrific casualties among Japanese soldiers and civilians, 10 times as many as the Americans in combatants alone.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Ripples of Battle: How Wars of the Past Still Determine How We Fight, How We Live, and How We Think
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.