Participating Persons: Reciprocity and Asymmetry

By Wondra, Ellen K. | Anglican Theological Review, Winter 2004 | Go to article overview

Participating Persons: Reciprocity and Asymmetry

Wondra, Ellen K., Anglican Theological Review

Where once the person was autonomous, now persons are relational. A fundamental shift in how personhood is seen is taking place as the contemporary world and contemporary society become more aware oi the implications of pluralism and diversity in "the global village." Westerners are no longer able to see themselves as individuals largely responsible for their own fates. Instead, we are increasingly aware that our lives are constantly interconnected with others, both near and far, and are much less of our own making than we have liked to believe.

A major characteristic of the modem period (beginning with the Enlightenment) is the claim that the human person is autonomous and independent. Critique of this claim is perhaps as old as the claim itself. Certainly Freud, Marx, and Nietzsche-those "masters of suspicion"-countered the notions that any person might be an unconHicted rational self separable from social structures and ideological interests. And a central element of what postmodemisms postdate is precisely the illusion of the autonomous self. Moving beyond the problems posed by the notion of the autonomous self, contemporary Western theologians are giving renewed attention to the interrelatedness of things, along with pastors, church leaders, and the many others who are concerned with the health of the church, its role in society, and its mission in the world. The relationships of humans with each other, of humans with the environing world, of those "inner" and "outer" worlds that make up a human lire, of human and divine, oi the divine life ad intra Mira: all these have been focal points as theologians seek to articulate the Christian faith in the world in which we currently live. Concepts of relationality are very much in development, in response both to a wide variety of contexts and to some of the pitfalls that have become apparent in the formulation of relationality itself. With Martin Buber, contemporary theologians may affirm, "In the beginning is relation."1 But they also recognize that not all forms of relationship are as healthy and generative as others. And to the extent that relationality itself is a major theme in contemporary theology, making distinctions of value between forms of relationship is necessary.

It is the purpose of this essay to sketch one possibility for such development as it affects theological understandings of persons, both divine and human. First, I will highlight the classical Christian notion of participation in order to show a contrast with modern notions of the person as autonomous. I will then outline the implications of the claim that persons are autonomous, and indicate some oi the problems with such a claim. Next I will briefly discuss the idea of mutuality as one way to construe relationality, and then turn to what I think is a needed and helpful modification of that idea. I will argue that greater attention to difference, to "the other" as other, is needed in contemporary theology both as a corrective and as a constructive possibility in understanding what it means to say that the very being of persons is inherently and unavoidably constituted in and through relationship. Without explicit focus on both reciprocity and asymmetry, I believe, theology runs the risk of perpetuating some of the very problems a focus on relationality wishes to address, most particularly those of responsible relationship with the other, whether divine or human. Construing relationship as always asymmetrical keeps in view the tendency in Western thought, culture, and practice to deny, suppress, or subsume difference. At the same time, emphasizing reciprocity keeps in view various disparities of power and the need to attend to them carefully. This approach also addresses a fundamental problem for modem and postmodern theology: how to draw on human experience in a way that affirms connectedness (relationality) between the divine and human and preserves the Otherness of God.

How theologians speak of persons is crucial to Christian ethics and the Christian life. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Participating Persons: Reciprocity and Asymmetry


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.