Defining Religiousness in Aging-An Agenda for Research

By Glicksman, Allen | Aging Today, January/February 2004 | Go to article overview

Defining Religiousness in Aging-An Agenda for Research


Glicksman, Allen, Aging Today


In the past few years, the topic of religion has emerged from relative obscurity and become a subject of great interest to researchers in aging. The study of religion and aging, like the study of health behaviors, has focused on the potential benefits of this domain on the physical and emotional well-being of older people. To test these potential benefits, researchers have devised numerous scales to measure the effects of religion on elders. An excellent example of such a scale can be found in Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for Use in Health Research published by the Fetzer Institute, Kalamazoo, Mich., in 1999.

The development of these measurements is curious because there does not seem to be a consensus on definitions of the term religiousness, a word that refers to the state or character of an individual's belief. Although most scales designed to measure the effects of religion on health assume a definition of religion as a formal system of belief in a supernatural deity, there seems to be no agreement on how to define or measure the strength of any individual's faith in such a system. Although each scale carries with it an implicit definition of the term through the questions asked, clear, specific and well-developed definitions of religiousness are frequently absent. The problem is made more complex by the attempt to separate the concepts of religion and spirituality into distinct categories.

UNTESTED ASSUMPTION

The scales designed to measure religiousness carry another, untested, assumption. If they are designed for use in research along with scales developed to measure other conditions and behaviors, then the implicit assumption is that the scales are not specific to any individual faith or belief system. No one has carefully examined this presumption that such measurements can be used with people of any religious background, whether they are Hindu, Jewish, Southern Baptist or members of any other community of believers who are generally recognized as a religion.

The problem is that if researchers wish to measure religiousness (or any other domain, for that matter), they need to be able to "operationalize" the term in the form of specific beliefs or behaviors that together form a measure of the underlying concept. For example, when investigators want to measure functional health, they list a series of health behaviors, such as the ability to walk a flight of steps or stand up without assistance. The same methods apply when measuring beliefs, such as feeling good about oneself, that might affect psychological well-being. The research and clinical communities share a broad consensus on what constitutes appropriate operationalizations of many aspects of physical and mental health, but none of these operationalizations relate to religiousness.

How can one operationalize the concept of religion? What specific beliefs or behaviors are common to all faith systems? These issues become more complex when people remember that operational scales must not contain a very large number of questions. To be truly universal measures of religiousness, the behaviors and beliefs on such scales must be core to all religious systems. Questions that contain assumptions of a single god are useless in polytheistic faiths. Questions that assume the primacy of private over public behavior will miss the mark when used among people whose faith systems stress the community over the individual. Questions that treat ritual as secondary to belief will fail to capture deep religious faith among those for whom ritual is the highest expression of belief. Questions that address God as a "he" will be difficult for those who worship female divinities.

Therefore, even if a study participant can understand the question and respond to it, researchers cannot assume that the question is correctly measuring the particular domain-religiousness, for example-in any given individual unless they understand that individual's faith tradition. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Defining Religiousness in Aging-An Agenda for Research
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.