The First Amendment's Limitations on the Use of Internet Filtering in Public and School Libraries: What Content Can Librrians Exclude?

By Nadel, Mark S. | Texas Law Review, April 2000 | Go to article overview

The First Amendment's Limitations on the Use of Internet Filtering in Public and School Libraries: What Content Can Librrians Exclude?


Nadel, Mark S., Texas Law Review


The explosion of the Internet-with its cornucopia of free information-has presented libraries with the opportunity to offer their patrons access to the most current and relevant information on thousands of important subjects. Among the millions of useful pages posted on the World Wide Web, however, a small percentage contain material that is obscene1 or libelous, promotes fraud, or is considered inappropriate for children.

Many libraries have sought to screen out "adult" material-often in response to local pressure-by purchasing software filters to control which web pages can be viewed on their Internet terminals.2 About a dozen have policies of providing only filtered access.3 Meanwhile, a number of federal and state legislators and local authorities have introduced bills that would require schools and libraries to use filters on Internet access links.' The American Library Association (ALA), however, finds that "the use of filtering software by libraries to block access to constitutionally protected speech violates the Library Bill of Rights, "5 and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) contends that "in the hands of government, blocking software is nothing more than censorship in a box. "6

Meanwhile, in the 1998 case Mainstream Loudoun v Board of Trustees of the Loudoun County Library,7 a federal district court in Virginia found that a library's use of a software filter violated the First Amendment.8

This Article contends that the First Amendment permits libraries to use filters as long as those filters are not employed to favor one sociopolitical viewpoint over another. Librarians may install filters to help their patrons use the library's computer terminals and Internet links to gain easier access to those categories of content the librarians choose to include in their collections. Thus, if patron use of terminals to monitor baseball games or to view websites advertised as XXX significantly inhibits access by researchers, libraries may use filters to screen out such sport play-byplay and XXX websites.9 Libraries may also use filters to help diminish children's access to adult material for children whose parents do not grant permission for such viewing.10

To prevent filters from being used to exclude viewpoints opposed by the software designers or other third parties, the First Amendment should be read to require that libraries using filters meet three standards. Libraries should have to (1) retain final say over selection decisions, (2) understand the criteria that the filter software uses to exclude content, and (3) have the resources to correct the viewpoint discrimination that the filters are likely to generate.

The Article reaches these conclusions by explaining why the same budgetary constraints that justify library selection decisions among books also justifies the use of Internet filters. Contrary to the rationale used in the Loudoun decision, there is no constitutionally significant difference between the library's discretion to manage its bookshelves and its discretion to manage its Internet access terminals. The First Amendment permits a librarian to purchase multiple copies of popular books to make preferred content more easily accessible to patrons, even though that necessarily entails declining to purchase even a single copy of many other books and thus "denying" patrons access to the latter. This same rationale permits a librarian to use filters to help ensure that preferred content will be more easily accessible to patrons, even if it necessarily involves denying them access to other constitutionally protected Internet content.

There are three kinds of filters that can be used to restrict Internet access. Content on the world wide web is posted on websites that have addresses called URLs (uniform resource locators). Each posting (whether of one or more "pages") usually has its own specific URL. The content of airy URL, meanwhile, can change dramatically from day to day. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The First Amendment's Limitations on the Use of Internet Filtering in Public and School Libraries: What Content Can Librrians Exclude?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.