Evaluating Media Coverage of Land Use and Sprawl: Lessons from California

By Fulton, William | The Quill, May 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Evaluating Media Coverage of Land Use and Sprawl: Lessons from California


Fulton, William, The Quill


The physical growth and change of any community is always high on the list of that community's issues --and, consequently, high on the list of issues for journalists to cover. Coverage of these "land use" issues is especially important in California, a state that has been growing continuously and rapidly for more than a century.

Furthermore, "urban sprawl" has emerged as a major political issue throughout the nation.

Evaluation of the how California journalists cover land use will be helpful to reporters across the nation. That's why the Foundation for American Communications recently commissioned two pathbreaking pieces of research on what journalists in California know about land use and how they cover it. FACS's survey of journalists and a content analysis of selected California newspapers was intended to provide a "baseline" of information about what journalists knew about land use and how it is covered.

The project is part of a major FACS initiative funded by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the James Irvine Foundation to significantly expand educational resources to help journalists cover land use.

Survey of California Journalists

The survey of California journalists was undertaken by American Opinion Research of Princeton, New Jersey. It sought to determine what journalists really know about land use and solicit their perceptions about how they cover the land use issue. The survey included approximately 25 questions, including several "truefalse" questions about specific land use issues and three land use "story scenarios, in which the journalists were asked to select one of several story "angles".

Among the most important findings were the following:

Journalists say that local government officials and environmental groups are the most useful sources of information on land use, while academics and federal officials are the least useful.

Journalists have an incomplete knowledge of land use and urban growth issues. Though most can identify basic terms, they are often misinformed about both broader trends and specific details,

Journalists are deeply divided over how to cover specific land use stories - though there appears to be more consensus on how to cover downtown development than other kinds of stories.

- An overwhelming majority of California journalists say they cannot find objective and unbiased sources of information about land use issues.

Journalists were also deeply divided on how to cover land use stories, at least based on their responses to the three-story scenarios. For example, in a scenario regarding the proposed approval of a 600-unit housing subdivision, the journalists were almost evenly divided in their inclination to focus on (1) the traffic congestion resulting from the project, (2) the question of where else needed housing should be built and (3) the identity of the opponents of the project.

By contrast, on a story scenario involving a proposed public subsidy for a movie theater in a downtown area, journalists were far more in agreement, They said their stories should focus on how the proposal would assist the city in reviving the downtown.

To some degree, the survey results confirmed our belief that journalists are sometimes poorly informed and often frustrated on land use assignments. In large part, however, it appears that journalists reflect the generally fuzzy public perception about what the goals of land-use planning are. In a case such as the downtown movie theater, the goal of the project - to revive the downtown - is clear and journalists understand that.

In most cases, however, the goal is not so clear. For example, is land-use policy regarding a suburban subdivision meant to facilitate the construction of more housing, or protect the environment or both? In most cases, the goal is to balance these goals and so it is difficult for journalists, like the public, to reach consensus on which aspects of a land-use story are most important to understand.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Evaluating Media Coverage of Land Use and Sprawl: Lessons from California
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?