Air Force Articulates Strategy for Managing Space Program

By Erwin, Sandra I. | National Defense, July 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Air Force Articulates Strategy for Managing Space Program

Erwin, Sandra I., National Defense

When the Army failed to recognize the significance of aerial combat in warfare, back in the 1940s, its air corps broke away and became the U.S. Air Force. More than 50 years later, the Air Force finds itself under similar criticism for giving short shrift to military operations in space.

Leading a preemptive campaign against critics is Maj. Gen. (s) Brian A. Arnold, director of space and nuclear deterrence at the office of the Air Force assistant secretary for acquisition. According to Arnold, the service wants to become a "fully integrated aerospace force." And those who accuse the service of being "aircraft-centric," he said in a recent interview, don't realize that "the resources we spend on space are enormous."

This fiscal year, the Defense Department will spend nearly $9 billion on space programs. The Air Force manages between 85 percent to 90 percent of those projects, which account for about 10 to 12 percent of the service's $70 billion annual budget.

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill, meanwhile, have questioned whether the Air Force is the best choice for managing U.S. military space assets, given that most of its dollars and programs have to do with air operations. One of the most outspoken critics, Sen. Robert Smith, R-N.H., told an industry conference last month that he does not see the Air Force as a "service dedicated to space power.

In the 2000 defense authorization bill, Congress ordered the creation of a 13-member commission to probe military space management and organization. That panel, chaired by former defense secretary and Republican congressman Donald Rumsfeld, will assess the potential costs and benefits of creating:

A separate military department and service dedicated to space.

A corps within the Air Force dedicated to space.

A position of assistant secretary of defense for space within the office of the secretary of defense.

A new budget mechanism for managing space funding within the Defense Department. Smith, a member of the Armed Services

Committee, was a key force behind the creanon of the commission and has been at the forefront of congressional efforts to fund space weapons programs. The senator also has included language in this year's defense bill directing the commission to address the organization of U.S. Space Command.

"America's future security and prosperity depend on our constant supremacy in space. This commission is a long-awaited step toward that goal," Smith said in a statement. "To achieve true dominance in space, we must combine expansive thinking with a sustained and substantial commitment of resources, and vest them in a dedicated, politically-powerful, independent advocate for space power."

Smith wants the commission to "address the organizational issues that have hampered this nation's maximum use of military space."

Arnold, meanwhile, believes that there is no justification for transferring the management of the military space program to any other agency or newly-created service. This notion only came about, he explained, because there is a perception that the Air Force is too focused on air programs and, when budgets are tight, it dips into the space accounts. Perceptions often become reality, said Arnold. And they are "very hard to overcome." He noted that, as far as space is concerned, the Air Force is "developing new systems, fielding them and gaining capabilities."

Space dollars compete with more than just aircraft dollars, said Arnold. They also are vulnerable to other non-Air Force defense programs, such as ships or land vehicles, he added. "It's not just the F-22 vs. space systems. The discussion should be taken to a higher level ... It's an overall [Defense Department] resource issue." The F-22 fighter plane is the Air Force's top acquisition priority today.

In a recently published "white paper," Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Michael E. Ryan and Secretary F.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Air Force Articulates Strategy for Managing Space Program


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?