Legal Notes

By Brody, David C. | Justice System Journal, January 1, 2003 | Go to article overview

Legal Notes


Brody, David C., Justice System Journal


Roell v. Withrow, 123 S.Ct. 1696 (2003), and the Federal Magistrate Act of 1979

In an effort to ease the burden on the federal judiciary of mounting caseloads, the Federal Magistrate Act of 1979 authorizes magistrate judges to "conduct any or all proceedings in a jury or nonjury civil matter and order the entry of judgment in the case, when specially designated-by the district court" and when acting "[u]pon the consent of the parties." 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1) (1979). Since President Carter signed the act into law, magistrate judges have been hearing more and more matters in the district courts. In fact, without the availability of magistrate judges to preside over a wide-ranging variety of proceedings, the federal judiciary would likely be overwhelmed.

The use of magistrate judges is not limitless. Before a magistrate judge may preside over a civil trial, both parties must affirmatively elect to forgo their right to have an Article III judge hear the matter. While the procedures for this consideration and acceptance are perceived as mere formalities, in Roell v. Withrow, 123 S.Ct. 1696 (2003), the Supreme Court was faced with a classic judicial dilemma in statutory interpretation and the enforcement of rules of procedure: mandating strict enforcement of a procedural rule that would give rise to an "unjust" result, or interpreting the intent of Congress in enacting a statute to discount a "technical omission" and lead to the result Congress surely intended.

Jon Withrow, a Texas state prisoner, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against three members of the prison's medical staff (Roell, Reagan, and Garibay), alleging that they had deliberately disregarded his medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. During a preliminary hearing the presiding magistrate judge told the parties that they could have her rather than the district judge preside over the entire case. While Withrow agreed orally (and later in writing), the Texas attorney general's office stated that they would consider the option and respond in writing.

Without waiting for the attorney general's response, the district judge referred the case to the magistrate judge for final disposition, pursuant to the Federal Magistrates Act. The referral included the caveat that "all defendants be given an opportunity to consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge," and that the referral order would be vacated if any of the defendants did not consent as required by 28 U.S.C. §636(c)(1). Defendant Reagan, who was represented by private counsel, gave written consent to the referral. Defendants Roell and Garibay, who were represented by the attorney general's office, did not respond to the referral.

Despite the lack of express consent to the referral, the case proceeded to trial in front of the magistrate judge. At trial, a jury found for the defendants/petitioners. On appeal the court of appeals sua sponte remanded the case to the district court to "determine whether the parties consented to proceed before the magistrate judge and, if so, whether the consents were oral or written." 288 F.3d 199 (5th Cir. 2002). Following the remand to the district court, Roell and Garibay filed a letter of consent with the district court, stating that "they consented to all proceedings before this date before the United States Magistrate judge, including disposition of their motion for summary judgment and trial."

The district court judge referred the matter back to the magistrate judge who presided over the trial, who found that Roell and Garibay, "by their actions clearly implied their consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate." Roell v. Withrow, 123 S.Ct. at 1700. Nonetheless, the magistrate judge found that (a) given the 5th Circuit's precedent, "consent cannot be implied by the conduct of the parties," (b) Roell and Garibay did not provide express consent, and therefore, (c) the magistrate judge had lacked jurisdiction to hear the case. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Legal Notes
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.