Impact 1996 the Year in Review: NCAA Toughens Freshman Eligibility Standards

Black Issues in Higher Education, January 9, 1997 | Go to article overview

Impact 1996 the Year in Review: NCAA Toughens Freshman Eligibility Standards


Impact 1996 The Year In Review: NCAA Toughens Freshman Eligibility. Standards

1996 will be remembered as the year the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) kept its promise to increase initial eligibility standards despite overwhelming evidence that minorities, women and low-income students would again be disproportionately affected.

The tougher standards, which went into effect in August, require freshman athletes to have a grade-point average of 2.5 in 13 core courses and a 700 SAT, in order to compete athletically. The rules allow a lower GPA to be offset with a higher SAT.

The new standards replace freshman eligibility requirements of a 2.0 GPA in 11 core courses with a minimum 700 SAT.

It will be a few years before the true impact of the new standards can be measured, but predictions based on the previous standards suggest that while graduation rates of student athletes may go up, a disproportionate number of minorities will suffer because they will not meet the standards.

According to the NCAA's own research, 85 percent of those negatively affected by the previous rise in standards were African American and 45 percent of them would have graduated if allowed to enroll in college. That compares to 6 percent of otherwise-qualified white students who would have been ruled ineligible.

The new standards are expected to exclude even more otherwise-qualified African Americans, who historically have not fared as well on the SAT as their white counterparts.

"Sticking with an unfair rule and voting to make it even worse, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, is morally questionable, to say the least," said Russell Grough, a professor of ethics at Pepperdine University and sports ethics fellow with the Institute for International Sport. "It is unfair to exclude students who, in fact, would graduate, simply to make the NCAA look like it is cracking down on the programs which exploit athletes. Such a fundamentally flawed proposal undermines academic integrity even more so because this sports bureaucracy is legislating a `one-size-fits-all' policy for very diverse institutions."

The NCAA proudly points to improved graduation rates, but some critics call it a smoke screen.

"We have to look at who we are harming," said Marilyn Yohe, a program associate with Fair Play, an organization which has vigorously protested the academic standards. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Impact 1996 the Year in Review: NCAA Toughens Freshman Eligibility Standards
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.