Books -- Free Press V. Fair Trial, Supreme Court Decisions since 1807 by Douglas S. Campbell
Bush, Ellen M., The Journalism Educator
There is no lack of books, law review articles, and textbook chapters on the conflict between a free press and a fair trial. However, author Douglas S. Campbell has taken a different approach in his historical survey of 30 major U.S. Supreme Court cases that focus on the problems of assembling an impartial jury while providing media access to the courts.
Campbell handles 30 major cases chronologically, each in a separate section of no less than four pages intended for non-lawyers. Beginning with Aaron Burr's trial for treason in 1807 and ending with Mu'Min v. Virginia, a 1991 case that considers racial bias, Campbell explores the tradition of an impartial jury. He takes the reader ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: Books -- Free Press V. Fair Trial, Supreme Court Decisions since 1807 by Douglas S. Campbell.
Contributors: Bush, Ellen M. - Author.
Journal title: The Journalism Educator.
Volume: 49.
Issue: 2
Publication date: Summer 1994.
Page number: 85.
© Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Winter 2008.
Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset