The Impact of Public Ownership, Profits, and Competition on Number of Newsroom Employees and Starting Salaries in Mid-Sized Daily Newspapers

By Lacy, Stephen; Blanchard, Alan | Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Winter 2003 | Go to article overview

The Impact of Public Ownership, Profits, and Competition on Number of Newsroom Employees and Starting Salaries in Mid-Sized Daily Newspapers


Lacy, Stephen, Blanchard, Alan, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly


This study of seventy-seven dailies between 25,000 and 100,000 circulation found publicly held daily newspapers produced higher profit margins than did privately held dailies. Public ownership and higher profits were associated with smaller newsroom staffs. Public ownership was positively related with starting salaries. Also, the presence of competition was positively correlated with newsroom size and starting salary. The impact of profitability on newsroom size was progressively greater for newspapers with higher-than-average profit margins.

The unexpected resignation in early 2001 of Jay Harris as publisher of the San Jose Mercury News drew attention to a newspaper industry trend that began more than forty years earlier. Harris resigned over budget cuts by parent company Knight Ridder. Part of the motive behind the cuts was the need to maintain profit levels expected of publicly held corporations by stock analysts and institutional investors.1

Although Harris' resignation surprised many, researchers have been investigating the impact of ownership on newspapers for several decades.2 More recently, research has investigated the impact of public ownership on newspaper performance.3

The trend toward increased control of newspaper companies by outside interests was one of two that reshaped the industry during the last half of the twentieth century. The other trend is the decline of competition among dailies. By 2001, fewer than a dozen markets had separately owned and operated dailies within a city, and another thirteen had joint operating agreements, antitrust law exemptions allowing two newspapers to combine all functions except the newsrooms.4 Although intracity daily newspaper competition has declined significantly, competition among dailies within counties and across county lines continues,5 as does competition among dailies and weeklies.6 However, companies' acquisition of dailies and weeklies in the same extended geographic area, called clustering, continues to eliminate newspaper competition.7 As a result of these moves, scholars disagree on the current extent of newspaper competition.8

Though there exists research about public ownership and competition, only one study has examined their relationship to newspaper performance. Lacy, Shaver, and St. Cyr found that public ownership correlated with lower newsroom budgets but that competition was a countervailing force.9 As the percentage of group newspapers facing competition from other dailies increased, the percentage of revenue devoted to the newsroom budget at publicly held newspapers increased.

The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of public ownership and competition on profit levels and then to examine how these variables relate to number of newsroom employees and starting salaries for reporters.

Literature Review

Ownership. The impact of ownership has received a great deal of scholarly attention during the last forty years, but early research was often atheoretical, concentrating on the decline of family-owned newspapers and the growth of newspaper groups.10 Recent studies have found limited differences in performance between independent and group newspapers.11 Compaine and Gomery concluded that corporateowned newspapers were as good or better than independently owned newspapers.12 However, their review did not include more recent research about the impact of public ownership on newspapers' financial performance.

During the 1990s, Deniers integrated organizational and ownership variables in examining the "corporate newspaper." He said the claim that corporate newspapers negatively affect journalism is overstated. He emphasized corporate structure but did not consider variations that might be connected to public versus private ownership.13 In a follow-up, he found that the structural complexity of a daily newspaper had a moderate correlation with use of content perceived as critical by city officials. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Impact of Public Ownership, Profits, and Competition on Number of Newsroom Employees and Starting Salaries in Mid-Sized Daily Newspapers
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.