"The New Libya" Backs a U.S.-Libyan Dialogue Group

By Bird, Eugene | Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, November 3, 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

"The New Libya" Backs a U.S.-Libyan Dialogue Group

Bird, Eugene, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs

"The New Libya" Backs a U.S.-Libyan Dialogue Group

Formation of a U.S.-Libya Dialogue Group was announced at a conference held on neutral territory in Malta during the last week of August. The new group will aim at improving business and political relations between the two countries after nearly two decades of sanctions and disagreements connected initially with Libyan actions in support of the Palestinian cause and culminating in the explosion of Pan American Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland.

"Within the legal context allowed us, the American side in the dialogue will seek to sponsor a major conference in the United States within the next three to six months, perhaps even in Washington, DC, as a first step in ending the eight years of stringent sanctions and almost 20 years Of bad relations," said Dr. Charles MacDonald of Florida International University, American co-chair of the new group.

However, United Nations sanctions now in suspension but not yet removed, U.S. sanctions that will not be suspended or removed at least until the end of the trial of the two Libyans before three Scottish judges sitting in the Netherlands and slated to begin in December, and the probability of civil actions by survivors of the Flight 103 victims that could threaten Libyan assets in the United States for years to come, make prospects for renewing full relations between the two countries more complex than they appeared at Malta.


A U.S. Supreme Court decision permitting civil suits in American courts against "terror designated states" despite sovereign immunity preventing such suits under international law, has opened the door for major claims against Libya that may take years to wend their way through the courts, if Libya chooses to defend itself. More likely is a negotiated compensation, which Libya has already provided in the case of a downed French passenger aircraft which exploded over Africa in December 1989.

The U.S. Supreme Court decision followed a campaign organized by the government of Israel's lobbying groups which urged the court to make it possible to pursue civil suits against the states designated as supporting terror in the Anti-Terror Act of 1995. Such suits could fie up closer relations with Libya or other Middle East states for years or decades. What worries legal experts is that the U.S. itself might be faced with similar suits in various parts of the world where American air power has resulted in civilian deaths, such as Serbia or Iraq.


Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jesse Helms (R-NC) is drafting new sanctions legislation that is aimed at regulating the presidential use of sanctions but it is not expected to be ready for the remaining part of this session of Congress. Nor is it expected to be at all flexible or to reduce the present sanctions being used throughout the Middle East against the "rogue" states.

Department of State and congressional sources are hopeful that the present chaotic use of sanctions by foreign policy advisers to the president will become more in accord with international practices and have better ground rules. Libyan diplomats have as their goal a lifting of U.S. sanctions within one year. But the blunt instrument of sanctions instead of the negotiations traditionally favored by professional diplomats is now applied in one form or another by the United States against 50 of the 194 countries in the world.


The three-day "Third Track" dialogue conference in Malta was the second such conference this year to be sponsored by the School of Management at the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands headed by Dr. M.S. El-Namaki. Considerable pressure was placed on the university by supporters of Israel in Holland to cancel the conference, at least until after the trial of the two Libyans in Holland ends sometime next year.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

"The New Libya" Backs a U.S.-Libyan Dialogue Group


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?