India-Initiated Cease-Fire in Kashmir Holds, Nawaz Sharif Allowed to Leave Pakistan

By M, M. | Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, March 31, 2001 | Go to article overview

India-Initiated Cease-Fire in Kashmir Holds, Nawaz Sharif Allowed to Leave Pakistan


M, M., Washington Report on Middle East Affairs


India-Initiated Cease-Fire in Kashmir Holds, Nawaz Sharif Allowed to Leave Pakistan

Prof. M.M. Ali is a consultant and a specialist on South Asia based in the Washington, DC area.

Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee's orders to his 700,000 troops to cease fire in the disputed state of Kashmir during the month of Ramadan, and its extension for another month ending Jan. 26, 2001, has been effective. Pakistan reciprocated by pulling back some of its forces from the U.N.-administered Line of Control (LoC).

Vajpayee's decision proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that New Delhi holds the key to peace in Kashmir. It also demonstrated that it was India's intransigence and years of military posturing that have been responsible for the continued killings of Kashmiris. By neutral third party accounts, over 50,000 Kashmiris have been killed in the last 11 years. Thousands more have been injured and maimed. Literally every Kashmiri family has been affected by the prolonged tragedy.

Vajpayee's overture, however, also exposed a not-so-subtle but nevertheless very significant truth: while Delhi can produce a cease-fire in hostilities, it cannot unilaterally guarantee peace in the state. Unless the root cause of the problem is tackled fairly and squarely, the present situation will prove to be merely a lull in the shooting war.

Another lesson, however distasteful it may be to the political pundits of Delhi or to their military brass, is that a meaningful solution to the dispute can be found only by negotiating with authentic Kashmiri leaders who have been fighting Indian occupation for years. No wonder the Indian government has agreed to talk to the Kashmiri umbrella organization, the All Parties Hurriyat Conference (APHC).

Yet another message is that Delhi finally has reconciled itself to the fact that Pakistan is very much a party to the Kashmir dispute and that no lasting solution can be reached without Islamabad's participation. Therefore, however reluctantly, Delhi has agreed to allow APHC leaders to visit Pakistan and discuss the issue there as well. Vajpayee has also agreed to meet with Pakistan's military ruler, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, as parleys progress.

Last but not least, what has unquestionably emerged out of the developments of the past two months is that Farooq Abdullah and his government in Srinagar are, for all purposes, irrelevant in the resolution of the dispute that for more than half a century has threatened to disrupt the peace of the entire region--unless, of course, Delhi has privately assured Abdullah that all this is nothing but an exercise in futility meant to keep the American monkey off India's back.

For it would be a mistake to think that there suddenly has been a change of heart in Delhi. The right-wing Hindu-dominated BJP government that is pushing Indian Muslims to the wall on the Babri Masjid question (see article p. 36) cannot lay down arms in Muslim populated Kashmir, even temporarily, for no reason.

New Delhi holds the key to peace in Kashmir.

The timing of Delhi's unilateral cease-fire declaration must have come as a great relief to the suffering Kashmiris. However valiantly carried out, the war of liberation must be experiencing fatigue syndrome. Each year inclement Himalayan winter weather and fasting during the month of Ramadan compound the problem, testing the level of people's tolerance. Vajpayee definitely factored this in when he announced his cease-fire.

The history of liberation movements, moreover, shows that freedom fighters walk arm-in-arm while the fight is on. When the time comes to talk peace, however, they tend to break ranks. Kashmir's mujahedeen, or freedom fighters, although united on the main issue, come from varying schools of thought ranging from moderate to extremist. The APHC is a loose conglomeration of groups, and others remain outside its fold. There are differences of opinion within the APHC as well. Although aware of the solidarity of the Kashmiris, New Delhi at the same time it is not unmindful of its weaknesses. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

India-Initiated Cease-Fire in Kashmir Holds, Nawaz Sharif Allowed to Leave Pakistan
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.