Who's Right in the U.S. and U.K. Dispute with Libya over the Bombing of Pan Am 103? Two Views: U.S. Case Is Based on "Might Makes Right"

By Boyle, Francis A. | Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, May 31, 1992 | Go to article overview

Who's Right in the U.S. and U.K. Dispute with Libya over the Bombing of Pan Am 103? Two Views: U.S. Case Is Based on "Might Makes Right"


Boyle, Francis A., Washington Report on Middle East Affairs


Who's Right in the U.S. and U.K. Dispute With Libya Over the Bombing of Pan Am 103? Two Views: U.S. Case Is Based on "Might Makes Right"

The dispute between Libya and the United States and the United Kingdom over the Lockerbie bombing allegations must be settled according to the principles of international law. The rights and obligations of each party are clearly laid out in various international treaties and the United Nations Charter, all of which support the principle of negotiation, mediation or arbitration in pursuit of a peaceful solution to international disputes. Libya has made a number of efforts to resolve the crisis peacefully, but the U.S. and the U.K. have consistently rejected these efforts. Instead, these states, in pursuit of their unfounded claims against Libya, are currently planning, preparing and conspiring to wage aggressive warfare against the people and government of Libya.

Libya and all U.N. Security Council members are parties to the 1971 Montreal Convention, which addresses acts of sabotage against civil aircraft such as the Lockerbie bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. The Convention requires that a state whose citizen is accused of committing an act of sabotage must either extradite that suspect or prosecute the alleged offender itself. The choice between extradition and prosecution remains Libya's sovereign right. By instituting criminal procedures against Abdel Basset Ali Al Megrahi and Lamen Khalifa Fhimah, the two Libyan nationals accused by the U.S. and the U.K. of carrying out the Pan Am 103 bombing, and notifying the concerned states that it has the two men in detention, Libya fully discharged charged its obligations under the Montreal Convention.

Libya has made a number of efforts to resolve the crisis peacefully.

Libya is not required to extradite the two suspects under U.S. extradition law, either, which permits the government to extradite "only during the existence of any treaty of extradition with [a] foreign government." No such treaty of extradition exists between Libya and either the United States or the United Kingdom.

The Montreal Convention also stipulates that the signatories cooperate with Libya in prosecuting the two suspects, but the U.S. and Britain have so far refused to extend this cooperation.

Should the U.S. or U.K. object to the manner in which Libya is handling the allegations against the Lockerbie suspects, under the Montreal Convention they may demand international arbitration through the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Who's Right in the U.S. and U.K. Dispute with Libya over the Bombing of Pan Am 103? Two Views: U.S. Case Is Based on "Might Makes Right"
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.