U.S. Signals Strengthened Ties with India, as Kashmir, Pakistan and Afghanistan Struggle for Normalcy

By M, M. | Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, June 3, 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

U.S. Signals Strengthened Ties with India, as Kashmir, Pakistan and Afghanistan Struggle for Normalcy


M, M., Washington Report on Middle East Affairs


U.S. Signals Strengthened Ties With India, as Kashmir, Pakistan and Afghanistan Struggle for Normalcy

Prof. M.M. Ali is a consultant and specialist on South Asia based in the Washington DC area. He is currently visiting the subcontinent.

Cross the Mediterranean from Europe and you have countries that still are striving to stave off the yoke of colonialism and seeking to exploit their natural resources for their own good, without external help or intervention. Sadly--as a result of the post World War I machinations of Western powers, particularly imperial Britain--their economies and their politics today are caught in a no-win situation. For the developing world, the post-World War II changes in the international balance of power have only made matters worse.

The collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the 1980s has posed new challenges for countries in the neighborhood of China and the newly independent Central Asian republics. For understandable reasons, the subcontinent of India and Pakistan (including Afghanistan) that falls in this general region has received special attention from the United States, the lone remaining superpower. This geo-political environment offers certain natural advantages to larger India and poses difficulties for smaller Pakistan. The nuclear capability of these two developing countries lends an added dimension and significance to the region.

It is interesting that President George W. Bush, bypassing the nuances of protocol, received visiting Indian Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh in the White House on April 5, sending a clear message that the new Republican administration wishes to maintain closer ties with New Delhi. The visit was preceded by a joint Republican-Democratic congressional memorandum to the White House urging the removal of all legal impediments in U.S.-Indian relations. Pakistan was included only incidentally in the memorandum.

The memorandum also coincided with former U.S. President Bill Clinton's visit to India to raise funds for the victims of the Gujarat earthquake. It has been known for some time that Washington is under pressure from powerful corporate America to facilitate investment opportunities in the vast Indian economy. Therefore, unless New Delhi fouls things up, U.S.-Indian ties are likely to get stronger in the coming four years of the Republican administration.

For its part, Pakistan must develop strategies to work around this growing American-Indian alliance, try to extricate itself from its economic morass, while meeting the demand of donor countries and international financial institutions for the restoration of democracy. A tall order--but, with grit and statecraft, manageable. The coming months will be interesting to watch. The hopes raised for a peaceful settlement of the Kashmir dispute by India's cease-fire announcement last November, and its subsequent extension until the end of May, have now melted. It is now clearer than ever that New Delhi is using the cease-fire announcement as a way to appease American pressure to settle the issue and also to keep the Kashmiris in good humor and Pakistan at bay. Its policy vis-a-vis Kashmir has not in fact changed. Indian military forces have continued to maintain their stranglehold on Kashmir. However, Delhi allows elements inside and outside the occupied state to flirt with different theories and options for the resolution of the dispute which has caused two wars to be fought between India and Pakistan during the last 54 years.

An old idea again afloat calls for Azad Kashmir, Gilgit and Baltistan to remain under Pakistani control (as they are now) for the next 10 years, and Jammu and Ladakh to remain with India (as they are now) for the next 10 years, with the Valley to be under a U.N. trusteeship--again, for 10 years. The future of the entire State of Jammu and Kashmir, according to this plan, would be decided after the intervening decade.

This formula reportedly has the approval of Washington and is being floated through non-official Kashmiri sources.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

U.S. Signals Strengthened Ties with India, as Kashmir, Pakistan and Afghanistan Struggle for Normalcy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?