Revised Code of Ethics for Commercial Arbitrators Explained

By Meyerson, Bruce; Townsend, John M. | Dispute Resolution Journal, February-April 2004 | Go to article overview

Revised Code of Ethics for Commercial Arbitrators Explained


Meyerson, Bruce, Townsend, John M., Dispute Resolution Journal


Both the AAA and the ABA House of Delegates Have Approved the Revised Code

The revised Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial Disputes brings the 1977 Code more in line with modern practice. This article is adapted from the Report to the House of Delegates of the American Bar Association recommending adoption of revisions to the Code.

About a quarter century ago, a small group of arbitrators and practitioners, representatives of the American Bar Association and American Arbitration Association, met over a long weekend, under the leadership of Judge Howard Holtzmann, to draft an important statement defining ethical duties for arbitrators in commercial disputes.1 Their effort became the 1977 AAA-ABA Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial Disputes (the 1977 Ethics Code). It has proved to be an invaluable ethical framework for arbitrators and others involved in the dispute resolution field.

Many federal and state courts have cited the 1977 Ethics Code with approval as providing the preeminent definition of standards of conduct in the field.2 The 7th Circuit was careful to note, however, that the Code does not have the force of law: "Although we have great respect for the Commercial Arbitration Rules [of the AAA] and the Code of Ethics for Arbitrators, they are not the proper starting point for an inquiry into an award's validity.... The arbitration rules and code do not have the force of law."3

Because the practice of arbitration has developed significantly since 1977, committees of the ABA and representatives of the AAA began to review whether changes in the laws governing arbitration, the increasing globalization of commercial transactions, and changes in the public perception and expectations of arbitration required revisions to the 1977 Ethics Code. The ABA efforts were aided by representatives of the CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution, the College of Commercial Arbitrators, and the National Arbitration Forum.

After several years of study and negotiations, agreement was reached by a joint ABAAAA working group on a proposed revision (the 2004 Revision).4 The Executive Committee of the AAA Board of Directors approved the 2004 Revision at its September 2003 meeting, and it is anticipated that the ABA BB House of Delegates will approve the revisions at the ABA Mid-Year Meeting in February 2004.5 Assuming that occurs, the 2004 Revision will become effective March 1, 2004.

The 2004 Revision preserves the style and format, and much of the language, of the 1977 Ethics Code. It is called a revision, rather than a new document, to signal its continuity with the many unchanged provisions of the 1977 Ethics Code and respect for the degree of judicial acceptance that it has achieved. All provisions of the 2004 Revision are subject to any contrary principles that may be found in governing law or applicable arbitration rules and also to the right of the parties to any arbitration to reach agreement on different rules and standards.

Presumption of Neutrality

The most fundamental and far-reaching change contained in the 2004 Revision is the application of a presumption of neutrality to all arbitrators, including party-appointed arbitrators. By contrast, the 1977 Ethics Code presumed that the party-appointed arbitrators to a three-person panel (tripartite arbitration) would not be neutral.6 This meant that, in practice, they were not only free to act as advocates for the positions of the party that appointed them, they were expected to act that way. Under the 7.977 Ethics Code, party-appointed arbitrators were to be considered "nonneutral unless both parties inform the arbitrators that all three arbitrators are to be neutral or unless the contract, the applicable arbitration rules, or any governing law requires that all three arbitrators be neutral." 7 Thus, absent contrary indications in the parties' agreement, the governing law or arbitral rules, the default rule was that all party-appointed arbitrators were considered nonneutral when no agreement for their neutrality had been made. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Revised Code of Ethics for Commercial Arbitrators Explained
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.