Extramural Research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse: Funding, Interests, and Public Policy

By Rogers, James M. | Journal of Drug Issues, Summer 2000 | Go to article overview

Extramural Research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse: Funding, Interests, and Public Policy


Rogers, James M., Journal of Drug Issues


Increased attention to drug abuse in the late 1980s led to large increases in funding for research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse. There was some expectation that new knowledge and improved technology would help shift the drug control focus away from law enforcement and toward treatment and prevention. The Institute and her primary research constituency of medical schools and universities responded with an important new emphasis on applied research focused on pressing social and medical problems. However, when public attention to drug abuse decreased in the mid 1990s, research sponsorship and activity reverted somewhat to its traditional concern with several areas of basic medical research relevant to but somewhat removed from the immediate needs of treatment and prevention programs. Advocates of demand side alternatives are left to wait for a medical breakthrough amidst a modest but steady stream of incremental research contributions to practice.

For several decades drug abuse control policy has been stalled in the U.S. at the crossroads of law enforcement and treatment/prevention. Law enforcement continues to dominate the policy mix despite widespread doubts about its overall efficacy and critics' claims of important social costs. Treatment and prevention programs have been expanded, but they still flounder on perceptions of a very limited technology and disappointing results. When the drug abuse issue burst onto the policy agenda in the late 1980s, there seemed to be little choice but to spend additional money on the standard policy areas of law enforcement, treatment, and prevention. Large budget increases were also devoted to drug abuse research, however, in the hope of improving existing services and developing new policy alternatives. With policy otherwise stuck, perhaps expanded research will lead to new knowledge and methods, better treatment and prevention programs, and thus a more effective mix of drug control policies.

Feverish concern over drugs in the late 1980s brought large increases in funding for drug control (see Figure 1 ). Total federal spending on domestic law enforcement, treatment, and prevention increased 491 % from 1986 to 1995 or from $1.9 billion to $11.2 billion; It now stands at $14.1 billion (1999). Across 1986 to 1995 domestic law enforcement funding increased 523% from $1.1 billion to $7 billion, while treatment and prevention went up 445% from $780 million to $4.3 billion. The law enforcement share of this domestic pie went from 51% to 62%, while treatment and prevention went from 49% to 38%. Increases were particularly large in 1987, 1989, and 1990 at 62%, 39%, and 53% (U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 1971-1999).

Increased expenditures for research on drug abuse treatment and prevention across the national government roughly parallel those for services across the boom years (see Figure 2). Federal spending for treatment and prevention research increased 425% from 1986 to 1995 or from $83.9 million to $440.8 million and now stands at $653 million ( 1999). Particularly large budget increases for treatment and prevention research also came in 1987 (69%, to $142 million), 1989 (37%, to $205.9 million), and 1990 (40%, to $287.9 million). Since then they have risen steadily to $655 million per year in 1999 (U.S. White House, 1999). Treatment and prevention research is thus a major investment and an important strategy in the latest push to relieve the nation of its drug abuse problem.

The lead federal research agency, the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), was established in 1972 as a key part of President Nixon's "war on drugs." Its mandate was to support and conduct research, provide technical assistance, and supervise treatment grants to states and localities. With the shift to block grant funding of local treatment programs in 1982, NIDA lost its supervisory role and became mostly a research actor.

The purposes of this paper are to describe and assess NIDA's research program across its 20-year history with an emphasis on the recent expansion. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Extramural Research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse: Funding, Interests, and Public Policy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.