Sustaining Drug Courts in Arizona and South Carolina: An Experience in Hodgepodge Budgeting*
Douglas, James W., Hartley, Roger E., Justice System Journal
Aquiring resources sufficient to carry out the constitutional and statutory functions of the judicial branch of government has long been an area of concern for state and local courts (see Baar, 1975; Tobin, 1999). judicial advocates have complained that the judiciary is often neglected when resources are distributed by executive and legislative officials (ABA Division for Public Education, 1999; American Bar Association, 1997; Wolfson, 1994). The problem of obtaining adequate resources is compounded when the courts seek funding above their baseline to initiate institutional reforms. Doing so asks elected officials to divert resources away from programs that are likely to yield greater ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: Sustaining Drug Courts in Arizona and South Carolina: An Experience in Hodgepodge Budgeting*.
Contributors: Douglas, James W. - Author, Hartley, Roger E. - Author.
Journal title: Justice System Journal.
Volume: 25.
Issue: 1
Publication date: January 1, 2004.
Page number: 75.
© National Center for State Courts 2008.
Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset