The Influence of the Family Preservation Model on Child Sexual Abuse Intervention Strategies: Changes in Child Welfare Worker Tasks

By Skibinski, Gregory J. | Child Welfare, September 1995 | Go to article overview

The Influence of the Family Preservation Model on Child Sexual Abuse Intervention Strategies: Changes in Child Welfare Worker Tasks


Skibinski, Gregory J., Child Welfare


Traditional child sexual abuse assessment and intervention methods can be problematic, especially in instances of intrafamilial offenses. This article discusses those problems, the benefits of alternative strategies in use today, and the adaptations that child welfare workers, social workers, and other professionals have made to enhance intervention effectiveness. Changes have occurred in the way child sexual abuse professionals assess cases, provide services, and interact with one another.

Traditional prosecutions of child sexual abuse offenders are problematic for many reasons, most notably because convictions are difficult to obtain [Eatman & Bulkley 1986; Harshbarger et al. 1986]; sentences are short [MacFarlane & Bulkley 1982; the University of Wisconsin Law School 1986]; and offender treatment is unlikely [Eatman & Bulkley 1986; the University of Wisconsin Law School 1986]. Felony prosecutions focus on convicting the offender rather than on solving the problems of dysfunctional families. In response, many communities have developed legal/treatment alternatives to felony prosecutions. The most significant innovation of these programs is that the whole family, including the offender, receives treatment at some stage of the legal proceedings [see Bulkley 1981; Mac Murray 1991; Whitcomb 1991; Young 1988]. These programs are often designed with first-time, intrafamilial child sexual abuse offenders in mind. They are especially noteworthy in that they are highly consistent with the family preservation philosophy that has emerged in relation to abuse and neglect situations when removal of the child is imminent.

The changes in intervention strategies are designed to preserve families in the short and long term. These new strategies affect the roles child sexual abuse intervention professionals play in the intervention process. This article discusses (1) the failure of the traditional intervention system; (2) the benefits of the innovative intervention programs and how those strategies further the family preservation philosophy; and (3) how child welfare workers and other professionals have adapted to those strategies.

Failure of the Prosecutorial and Penal Systems

Traditional criminal intervention programs are more retributive than are the innovative programs. Incapacitation is the main strategy employed to control offenders and protect victims and society. Prosecutors hope to incarcerate or at least restrain the alleged offender by arrest or imprisonment. But child sexual assault, in contrast to rape and other sex crimes, is more likely to be an assault of psychological coercion rather than physical violence, especially if the victim knows the offender [Arthur 1986; Faller 1990]. Further, due to the progressive nature of child sexual assaults, fondling and other less invasive contacts are more common than orifice penetration. For example, White et al. [1983] found that less than 15% of molested girls had overt genital trauma or a sexually transmitted disease. Consequently, medical examinations following abuse reports are not likely to be performed or yield compelling evidence [Skibinski 1990]. Prosecutors have little basis except the child's testimony on which to try the case, making conviction (which necessitates proof beyond a reasonable doubt) difficult.

The traditional criminal prosecution system has two other problems: (1) prison terms are short [MacFarlane & Bulkley 1982; University of Wisconsin Law School 1986] and (2) treatment in prison is unlikely [Eatman & Bulkley 1986; University of Wisconsin Law School 1986]. Although physical separation by imprisonment will temporarily stop the offender from abusing the child, there is no assurance that once released, the offender will not abuse again, especially if no treatment was received in prison.

If outcomes of abuse rates and the children's well-being would be at least as good as with traditional intervention approaches, then diverting the offender into an innovative program with a family treatment component becomes a compelling alternative. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Influence of the Family Preservation Model on Child Sexual Abuse Intervention Strategies: Changes in Child Welfare Worker Tasks
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.