Sudan under Fire

By Powell, Sara | Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, October 2004 | Go to article overview

Sudan under Fire


Powell, Sara, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs


Discussing the pressing humanitarian crisis in Darfur, Sudan at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, DC on Aug. 11 were Omar Ishmael of the Darfur Peace and Development Organization; Adotei Akwei, Amnesty International director for Africa; and Kristin Wells, a congressional aid to Rep. John Conyers (D-MI).

Although each speaker acknowledged that the situation was far more complex than the mainstream press was reporting, none of them addressed those complexities fully.

Ishmael, who is from the Darfur region, spoke emotionally of the systematic failure throughout Sudan's history to address ethnic, cultural, and economic tensions between tribes. Sudan, he explained, was formed from three regions, becoming known as Sudan around 1820, but successive governments had not tried to integrate the three regional groups. In the only mention of colonialism's effect on the country's current situation, Ishmael said the British exacerbated that disintegration through "closed district" zones which isolated the south.

It was the British, according to Ishmael, who annexed Darfur in 1922, but it was not until January 1956 that Sudan gained its independence. Reiterating that no social or economic issues in Darfur had been addressed, resulting in long-term rifts in the area, Ishmael faulted the present government, in power for 13 years, for having failed to solve such historic problems in what he described as one million square miles of underdeveloped land.

The world should care about this region, he said, because of the oil in Chad and the French pipeline running through Cameroon-and because that million square miles could turn into a breeding ground for terror. Although he had begun his talk by saying that Darfur's problems were more complex than Arab versus African, Ishmael concluded by saying that it would be a disservice to the Sudanese people to turn the situation into a semantic debate over the use of the word "genocide." Saying the U.S. had used the term, he challenged Americans to "do something about it."

Amnesty International's Akwei agreed that the "genocide or not" debate was a distraction, and that the situation needed intervention. He conceded that Amnesty International had not declared genocide, while acting as if it were.

Akwei distinguished three aspects of the problem: humanitarian, security, and peacekeeping.

On a human scale, Akwei cited numbers of 2.2 million affected, 1.3 million displaced and in need of aid for at least two years, only 800,000 who would be fed in even the best case scenario, and that 300,000 to 350,000 people were projected to die by December. Moreover, he said, despite the many donations, the food assistance project in place would likely run out by October. He asked the audience not to let U.S. elections delay aid.

On the question of security, Akwei said that the region's militias, such as the outlawed Janjaweed, were carrying out deliberate attacks, and accused the Sudanese army of doing likewise. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Sudan under Fire
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.