Kabaka Mutesa and Venereal Disease: An Essay on Medical History and Sources in Precolonial Buganda

By Tuck, Michael W. | History In Africa, January 1, 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Kabaka Mutesa and Venereal Disease: An Essay on Medical History and Sources in Precolonial Buganda


Tuck, Michael W., History In Africa


I

In an article in History in Africa about the Ganda monarch Mutesa, Richard Reid argued that Mutesa likely suffered from syphilis.1 In a chapter on Mutesa in a just published volume, John Rowe concluded that the disease from which Mutesa suffered was gonorrhea.2 While on the surface similar-both sexually transmitted, neither particularly desirable-the diseases are actually quite different. Popular biographies often offer gossip about individuals' medical histories, but there can be legitimate reasons to investigate the medical history of past leaders, two of which are pertinent here. First, the medical conditions from which they suffered may well have affected their lives and their decisions as leaders. Reid addresses this point, speculating that Mutesa's syphilis may have progressed to an extent that it affected him mentally. Reid suggests that this might help explain Mutesa's erratic behavior toward the latter years of his reign, as he shifted his favor from one court group and foreign delegation to another.3 Rowe raises a similar point about Mutesa's health and competing groups, although in a different way. Rowe shows how Mutesa's illness became a point of competition between foreign missionaries and indigenous religious specialists as each sought to win his favor by curing his illness.4 Reid and Rowe also both mention the effect Mutesa's illness had on the perception of him as Kabaka. The Baganda equated the health and well-being of the Kabaka with the health of the kingdom, and Mutesa's extended illness and bedridden state would not have been a positive attribute.

Reid and Rowe are not the only scholars to find Mutesa's health significant. Kenny uses the Kabaka's ill health as a way to examine the very nature of the kingship in Buganda, although for his purpose the actual disease or illness is not considered relevant.1 Wright's book, which focused on the era after Mutesa, also mentioned the Kabaka's illness and the effect it had on his governing and on perceptions of his abilities.'' I would argue that the nature of Mutesa's illness holds importance even for studies like those of Kenny and Wright, where the exact manifestation of breakdown in the king's body may be taken for a breakdown in the kingdom. A study of Mutesa's illness may shed some light on this important time in the history of Buganda, whether one is looking for political or metaphorical issues. For that reason this paper is less about whether Reid or Rowe is correct, than about what an examination of the issue can reveal to us.

Another reason to investigate Mutesa's illness is for what it can tell us about medical history and health conditions more generally in Buganda in the second half of the nineteenth century. As with all history, the question of sources looms large. The attention paid to monarchs and other elites in historical sources provides us a glimpse into societies at times for which we may have few other sources. While we cannot automatically equate the health of a ruler and that of his people-given likely differences in diet and manual labor regimes between the different tiers of society-these differences were probably smaller in nineteenth-century Buganda than in England at the same time. Therefore the elites of Buganda were more likely to have the same ailments as the lower ranks of society. The information about Mutesa by foreign visitors in particular adds an important dimension to our knowledge of this time and place.

I will explain why, based in part on Ganda sources, it was unlikely that venereal syphilis existed in the region at this time. This is an important point that has been debated by doctors and medical historians for nearly one hundred years. As a result I argue that Mutesa suffered from gonorrhea or a similar complaint, and suggest ways that this would have affected him. The complications of gonorrhea are not as dramatic as the mental involvement of late syphilis, but would still have had an impact on his rule, finally, I will suggest what Mutcsa's gonorrhea can tell us about health conditions at this time, and the impact on the wider population.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Kabaka Mutesa and Venereal Disease: An Essay on Medical History and Sources in Precolonial Buganda
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?