Paying Attention to "CULTURE" in International Commercial Arbitration

By Slate, William K., II | Dispute Resolution Journal, August-October 2004 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Paying Attention to "CULTURE" in International Commercial Arbitration


Slate, William K., II, Dispute Resolution Journal


This paper is adapted from remarks Mr. Slate delivered on May 18 , 2004, at the 17th ICCA conference in Beijing, China.

The subject of this address is "culture" and its impact on international commercial arbitration. We lawyers have often invoked "cultural differences" to mean a clash of legal processes-such as the different procedures used in civil and common law countries. More recently, "cultural differences" have been invoked by both civil and common-law practitioners to criticize-with some justification-the use by U.S. attorneys of litigation-style procedures in the arbitration forum that expand the time and costs of the arbitration process.

But another cultural development that has the pendulum swinging in the other direction seems to have gone virtually unnoticed. That is the growing impact of international norms on arbitration practices in the United States. The most recent example is the new American Bar Association/American Arbitration Association Code of Ethics for Commercial Arbitrators, which adopts the international neutrality standard for party-appointed arbitrators. Another example is the growing practice of U.S. companies of referring to the International Bar Association Rules of Evidence in the arbitration clause in their international contracts. These developments suggest that U.S. ADR practices are influenced by cultural elements in other parts of the world.

The trend toward a more uniform approach to international arbitration is also evidenced by the widespread enactment, in whole or in part, of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration by countries throughout the world, and the recently approved UNCITRAL Model Law on International Conciliation, which a number of countries have enacted.

While differences in conflict resolution processes have historically been discussed under the banner of "cultural differences," we surely could all agree that "legal cultures" do not exist in an intellectual vacuum. Rather they are the products of the fundamental values of the society, based on history, language, and the perceptions of justice and social norms. Understanding these values has significant qualitative consequences for international arbitration, as the distinguished Mr. Ahmed El-Kosheri noted during the ICCA conference in Seoul in 1996. He went beyond the traditional legal perspective on "culture" to sound a salutary warning from the Arab world:

In general, the legal community throughout the Arab world is still manifesting its hostility to transnational arbitration .... the continuing attitude of certain western arbitrators being characterized by a lack of sensitivity towards the national laws of developing countries and their mandatory application, either due to the ignorance, carelessness, or to unjustified psychological superiority complexes, negatively affecting the legal environment required to promote the concept of arbitration in the field of international business relationships.

Mr. El-Kosheri's candid observations state in non-legal language how critically necessary it is to be culturally sensitive. Indeed, the importance of cultural sensitivity has not gone unnoticed in the research of psychologists, anthropologists and scholars in international diplomacy and business. Their research has led corporations to spend hundreds of millions of dollars learning about nuances in language, societal values and taboos in foreign nations in which they plan to launch business enterprises. Yet we in the international arbitration community have made little or no effort to be culturally sensitive to the parties to international commercial arbitration. At most, we may note civil and common law differences in the arbitration process. But we largely consider cultural differences in people to be unimportant, if we consider such differences at all. Then we cram the parties' dispute into the same conflict resolution machine.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Paying Attention to "CULTURE" in International Commercial Arbitration
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?