How Canadian Legislators View Health Promotion: Does Party Affiliation Matter?

By Ashley, Mary Jane; Cohen, Joanna E et al. | Canadian Journal of Public Health, January/February 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

How Canadian Legislators View Health Promotion: Does Party Affiliation Matter?


Ashley, Mary Jane, Cohen, Joanna E, Northrup, David A, Ferrence, Roberta G, Canadian Journal of Public Health


Legislators are ultimately responsible for enacting policies that bear directly on health promotion in the population. Yet, research into what determines legislators' views of health promotion and their perceptions of the role of government has been limited. One notable exception is a recent American study of the voting intentions of legislators in North Carolina, Texas and Vermont with regard to tobacco control policies.1

In this report, we describe the views of Canadian legislators on selected aspects of health promotion. Given the emphasis on political party that characterizes the Canadian parliamentary system, we also present these perspectives according to political party affiliation.

METHODS

The data were collected as part of the Canadian Legislator Study.2,3 All Canadian federal (n=291) and provincial/territorial (n=741) legislators, serving as of October 1996, were eligible to participate in a structured, computer-assisted telephone interview, conducted in either English or French between July 1996 and June 1997. The overall response rate was 54% (n=553). The response rates for legislators belonging to the Liberal, Progressive Conservative, New Democratic and Reform parties (n = 510) were 58%, 50%, 68% and 75%, respectively. Overall, response rates did not vary by age, sex, educational attainment, or having an academic degree. However, current or former ministers or party leaders, those who were lawyers, and those with longer length of service were less likely to respond (p<0.05). Although the emphasis was on tobacco control" legislators' views on the role of government in health promotion and their support for selected health promotion issues were also addressed.

In this analysis, federal, provincial, and territorial legislators are combined. The findings are presented for all respondents and by political party, where the respondents numbered 40 or more. Chi-square tests were performed to determine if overall differences in the responses of legislators across party affiliations were statistically significant.

RESULTS

A majority of Canadian legislators agreed that government has a major role in promoting healthy lifestyles (Table I). However, legislators affiliated with the New Democratic (NDP) and Liberal parties were much more likely to support a major role for government than were respondents affiliated with the Progressive Conservative (PC) and Reform parties. A converse pattern was found for the view that promoting healthy lifestyles is mostly the responsibility of individuals. Indeed, almost half (48%) of the Reform party legislators supported this position.

Support for the role of government in five specific health promotion domains was also examined. The only health promotion area in which a clear majority of all legislators thought that government should play a major role was discouraging youth from starting to smoke. Less than one third of all legislators saw a major role for government in encouraging physical activity and healthy eating habits.

For each of these domains, a similar and statistically significant pattern of differences across the parties was found. Across the domains, New Democrats were generally most supportive and Reformers least supportive of a major role for government. Liberals tended to be close to the New Democrats in their support, while Progressive Conservatives were considerably less supportive than Liberals.

Legislators also differed statistically across party affiliations in their perceptions of the impact of health promotion programs and policies. New Democrats were most likely to agree that health promotion programs and policies would save money in the long run, and Reformers were least likely to agree that such interventions would change most people's behaviour.

For three other health promotion issues (violence on television, side-impact air bags in cars, and tobacco advertising), legislators were asked about the regulatory role of government versus the role of industry (Table II).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

How Canadian Legislators View Health Promotion: Does Party Affiliation Matter?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?