Poor Vision -- the War against the Poor: The Underclass and Anti-Poverty Policy by Herbert J. Gans

By Sugrue, Thomas J. | Tikkun, September 1995 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Poor Vision -- the War against the Poor: The Underclass and Anti-Poverty Policy by Herbert J. Gans

Sugrue, Thomas J., Tikkun

The War Against the Poor: The Underclass and Anti-Poverty Policy, by Herbert J. Gans. Basic Books, 1995. 208 pp. $21.

We live in a strange and disturbing political world. A Democratic president proposes an overhaul of the welfare state that Reagan and Bush imagined but could never implement. A right-wing dominated Congress denounces Clinton's sweeping proposal to "end welfare as we know it" as soft-bellied liberalism. The welfare debate has shifted so far to the Right in the last two years that family-values centrist Daniel Patrick Moynihan now guards the liberal flank.

Whether Democratic or Republican, there is a depressing sameness to the analysis of poverty shaping what are probably the most sweeping changes in the welfare state since the New Deal. Liberals and conservatives alike share a new consensus that the most pressing social problem of the 1990s is not poverty but the behavior of poor people. The solution is coercion and punishment.

In the demonology of the New Right, poverty is a symptom of immorality. Like born-again Calvinists, conservatives view poverty as the outward manifestation of inner depravity. The poor, in their view, are lazy, violent, sex-crazed, and addicted to drugs. Bad mothers and absent fathers breed a generation of criminal boys and promiscuous girls. Barely beneath the surface are assumptions about racial inferiority. Although the majority of poor people in the United States are white, the popular image of poverty has a Black face.

The Democratic mainstream has accepted the premises of the right-wing critique of welfare, even as it repudiates Republican mean-spiritedness. In place of shock therapy, Democrats speak of "tough love." Centrist Democrats share the Republican view that the poor are dangerously dependent on government assistance. They concur that poor people should be made to work. They agree that bad parenting causes poverty. They do not dispute the Right's diagnosis of the problem but offer a kinder, gentler prescription for reform: Trim welfare, mandate work, but provide the helping hand of training and education programs. However compassionate he sounds, Clinton's welfare reform proposal shares with Republican ones the belief that behavior modification is the solution to poverty.

The tragedy of current welfare debates is that they occur in the midst of a swiftly changing economy--but utterly fail to grapple with wrenching structural change. Some conservatives (following Lawrence Mead) believe that jobs are plentiful, but poor people simply refuse to accept them. On the harder Right, others follow Charles Murray and Richard Hermstein in contending that cutting welfare will force poor people of color to accept jobs appropriate to their inferior intelligence. Liberals (following Robert Reich) emphasize the educational mismatch between the poor and the new, high- technology job market. They argue that the solution to inequality is just a matter of educating the poor to become "symbolic analysts," or at least to adapt to the demands of the new computerized workplaces of the future. Put laptops in classrooms, and the children of the inner city will eventually join their better-educated counterparts in the office towers and corporate campuses of the global economy.

Both liberals and conservatives are blinded by wishful optimism about the ability of the American economy to provide adequate employment. While politicians decide how to reinvigorate a work ethic among the poor, structural changes in the economy are wreaking havoc in poor people's lives. The jobs that provided the bedrock of economic security for masses of Americans forty years ago have largely disappeared. Those that remain are likely to be low-wage, insecure, and without benefits. Since 1980, the most rapid job growth has occurred in the service sector, particularly in part-time or temporary work. The consequences of this economic transformation are rising inequality, increasing poverty, and urban devastation.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Poor Vision -- the War against the Poor: The Underclass and Anti-Poverty Policy by Herbert J. Gans


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?