Publisher's Notes

By Goldberg, Danny | Tikkun, May/June 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Publisher's Notes

Goldberg, Danny, Tikkun

Publisher's Notes

Danny Goldberg is copublisher of TIKKUN.

As someone who believes in God and prays every day, I am sickened by the way Democrats and Republicans use religion in politics. Instead of trying to create and implement programs that express the deep spiritual truth of human beings' interconnectedness, a truth that is inherent in all religions, the political class views religious language and symbolism as devices for constituency-building or social control or both. It is neither anti-religion nor unspiritual to vigorously oppose such distortions.

In an article for the American Prospect that contained much of the rationale for many aspects of the Gore-Lieberman campaign, Gore pollster and strategist Stan Greenberg wrote that following the Monica Lewinsky scandal, "Democrats were again identified with a 1960s-style irresponsibility. Voters want political leaders who put family at the center of political discussion and are drawn to candidates who respect the public's religious faith." Undoubtedly this theory heavily influenced Gore's selection of Joseph Lieberman, the most overtly religious candidate for national office since William Jennings Bryan.

Similarly, during the election Bush cited Jesus Christ as his favorite philosopher, and appeared at an Iowa drug and alcohol addiction treatment center sitting in front of a huge picture of Jesus. At the inauguration there were numerous references to Jesus Christ and one of President Bush's first public actions after being inaugurated was to propose making it easier for religious organizations to receive tax dollars--a supposedly more constitutionally valid version of his Attorney General John Ashcroft's "charitable choice" proposal from 1996.

It is both a moral and a political mistake for Democrats to get sucked into Bush or Lieberman's seductive attempts to blend religion and politics.

The Bush/Ashcroft proposal for using tax dollars to fund religious groups' social service activity is dangerous. I have enormous admiration for the social service work of religious charities. My family visits and supports the St. Joseph's Church on our block because they have the best soup kitchen and homeless shelter in the neighborhood and the local priest, Father Tos, radiates spirituality, inclusiveness, and caring. Government funding of Catholic programs would not, however, go directly to spiritual beacons like Father Tos, but to governing institutions such as the New York Archdiocese whose hierarchy--including the current Cardinal Egan--has made attacks on artistic freedom, gay and lesbian rights, and women's right to an abortion a major part of its public mission.

Religions have the legal right to discriminate in hiring and may choose who they serve based on religious views. Federal funding of religious programs would have the effect of forcing all Americans to subsidize such discrimination. Moreover, the government, while not endorsing one particular religion, would be creating a cartel of those religions which have sophisticated lobbying efforts. Religions that are not part of the cartel, and the millions of Americans who are not affiliated with a religion, would be excluded from equal treatment.

Furthermore, the "winning" religions, the ones that did attract government funding, would be distracted from their core spiritual culture and orient themselves more and more toward pleasing the government, as several of TIKKUN's Religion in Politics panelists also argued (November/December 2000). Even Reverend Pat Robertson has opposed the Bush plan on this basis, although his alternative, allowing taxpayers to make donations to religions of their choice in lieu of paying taxes, poses even greater problems. We all would love to pay taxes only for those programs we support!

I believe that the vast majority of Americans believe in God, but I don't think that this is the same as believing in one specific religion or group of politically approved religions.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Publisher's Notes


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?