Trespassing Speakers and Commodified Speech: First Amendment Freedoms Meet Private Property Claims

By Bunker, Matthew D. | Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Winter 2000 | Go to article overview

Trespassing Speakers and Commodified Speech: First Amendment Freedoms Meet Private Property Claims


Bunker, Matthew D., Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly


Legal claims based upon private property rights are increasingly infringing upon interests in freedom of speech and the free dissemination of information. This essay examines both "real" property claims and intellectual property rights that affect free speech and urges that courts, legislatures, and others carefully scrutinize new attempts to impute trespass liability and commodify information.

"We ride high on post-cold war triumph convinced that all the ills of society would be remedied if only we propertized everything. And so we do, or at least, we try." - Lawrence Lessig1

Introduction

As we enter the twenty-first century, a conflict between fundamental rights that has been in many ways long suppressed is coming increasingly, indeed insistently, to the fore. First Amendment free speech and press rights, and related interests in newsgathering and the free dissemination of information, are colliding head-on with a variety of property claims. Although there has always been some tension between property ownership and free speech, a number of developments suggest that the intersection of property rights and free expression will be an increasingly important feature of the First Amendment landscape. Decisions currently being made by legislatures and courts may well have a profound influence on the future course of free speech and the free flow of information.

To those of us interested in free expression, property rights hardly have the same cachet as First Amendment freedoms. Yet, as legal scholar Justin Hughes has pointed out, property rights are almost certainly more fundamental to our legal system than are conceptions of freedom of thought and expression. Hughes noted that "ideas about property have played a central role in shaping the American legal order. For every Pilgrim who came to the New World in search of religious freedom, there was at least one colonist who came on the promise of a royal land grant or one slave compelled to come as someone else's property."2 Property rights thus have a central place in the legal universe and often tend to trump competing claims. Because various property doctrines developed both earlier than, and largely in isolation from, legal concepts of free speech, the intersections between legal principles from the two areas are often confusing.

Property claims that potentially conflict with free speech interests are legion. They include copyright, trademark, the right of publicity, newsgathering torts, and a host of other possible claims. As intellectual property scholar Diane Leenheer Zimmerman, writing nearly a decade ago, noted: "The truth is that, despite large areas of peaceful coexistence between the values protected by the Speech and Press clauses and those defended by property doctrines, conflict between the two is serious. What seems to have happened in the course of this conflict is that an everexpanding array of new or reconstructed property theories is cannibalizing speech values at the margin. In large part, this has occurred not because speech claims are inherently weaker than property claims, but because courts fail to think critically about the justifications for, functions of, and limitations on property rules in the sensitive area of speech."3 If anything, the conflict between speech and property rights has intensified in the years since Professor Zimmerman wrote those words.

This essay will examine a few "hot spots" in the ongoing struggle between property claims and concerns with free expression and the free dissemination of ideas and information. No claim is made that this brief survey is encyclopedic. Rather, the attempt is to touch on a few key intersections that highlight the larger theme under discussion. In the interest of an accessible discussion, I have in some spots omitted a few legal niceties, for which I hope my fellow legal scholars will forgive me. The essay first touches on "real" property claims that affect free speech, and then moves on to a brief discussion of (intangible) intellectual property claims that have similar implications.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Trespassing Speakers and Commodified Speech: First Amendment Freedoms Meet Private Property Claims
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.