A ''Grade A " Controversy: A Dialogue on Grading Policies and Related Issues in Higher Education

By Voge, Dominic J.; Higbee, Jeanne L. | Research & Teaching in Developmental Education, Fall 2004 | Go to article overview

A ''Grade A " Controversy: A Dialogue on Grading Policies and Related Issues in Higher Education


Voge, Dominic J., Higbee, Jeanne L., Research & Teaching in Developmental Education


On April 26, 2004 the Associated Press released an article announcing that the faculty at Princeton University had voted 156 to 84 to approve a new policy to respond to grade inflation (Princeton approves grade-rationing, 2004). Despite efforts since 1998 to encourage Princeton faculty to reduce the number of As assigned, the ratio has grown to 46% in recent years, as compared to 31% in the 1970s. Under the new policy, which goes into effect beginning fall 2004, faculty must limit the number of As awarded in the standard undergraduate courses they teach to 35%. For juniors and seniors engaged in independent study, up to 55% may be awarded As. Now that Princeton is leading the way, are other institutions likely to follow? The purpose of this column, presented in a dialogue format, is to discuss some of the issues inherent to the Princeton policy and to provide the foundation for further conversation at both the local and national levels.

The Princeton faculty's decision to implement a new policy was based upon that institution's analysis of local grading trends over three decades. Faculty and administrators at other colleges and universities, and particularly at other Ivy League institutions and at large public research universities, have voiced similar concerns (Bartlett, 2003; Grade Inflation, 2003; Marklein, 2002; Milzoff, Paley, & Reed, 2001; Rojstaczer, 2003; Rosovsky & Hartley, 2002; Special Report, 2003), which have been publicized widely in campus, local, and national media, including such diverse publications as the Christian Science Monitor, the Washington Post, and USA Today.

Over the past four decades, some of the potential reasons cited for grade inflation have included enabling students to maintain their draft deferments during the Vietnam War era (Princeton approves grade-rationing, 2004; Rojstaczer, 2003), or more recently their grade-based full-tuition scholarships, such as the state of Georgia's Helping Outstanding Pupils Educationally (HOPE) scholarship (Georgia's HOPE scholarship program, n.d.; Brice, 1997). Faculty members have gone on record to report situations in which they have felt pressured to award higher grades?. Stuart Rojstaczer (2003), a professor at Duke University who has also served as a visiting scholar at Stanford University, wrote that he had not assigned a C for 2 years. He asserted,

A's are common as dirt in universities nowadays because it's almost impossible for a professor to grade honestly. If I sprinkle my classroom with the C's some students deserve, my class will suffer from declining enrollments in future years. In the marketplace mentality of higher education, low enrollments are taken as a sign of poor-quality instruction.

Harvey Mansfield (2001), a professor of government at Harvard University, wrote, At Harvard, we have lost the notion of an average student. By that I mean a Harvard average, not a comparison with the high-school average that enabled our students to be admitted here. When bright students take a step up and find themselves with other bright students, they should face a new, higher standard of excellence.

The loss of the notion of average shows that professors today do not begin with their own criteria for the performance of students in their courses. Professors do not say to themselves, "This is what I can require; anything above that enters into excellence." No. With an eye to student course evaluations and confounded by the realization that they have somehow lost their authority, professors begin from what they think students expect. American colleges used to set their own expectations. Now, increasingly, they react to student expectations . . .

Thus, a recurring theme is that faculty members who do not capitulate to students' expectations for higher grades will face lower course enrollments and evaluations by students-factors that are considered in the merit raise and promotion and tenure processes. Mansfield proposed,

In a healthy university, it would not be necessary to say what is wrong with grade inflation.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A ''Grade A " Controversy: A Dialogue on Grading Policies and Related Issues in Higher Education
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.