Genetics and the Logic of Evolution

By Jamieson, James | Mankind Quarterly, Fall 2004 | Go to article overview

Genetics and the Logic of Evolution


Jamieson, James, Mankind Quarterly


Genetics and the Logic of Evolution

Kenneth W. Weiss and Anne Buchanan

John Wiley and Sons, 2004

This is a truly exciting book - and one which contains surprises. Author Kenneth Weiss, professor of Anthropology and Genetics and Anne Buchanan, Senior Research Scientist in Anthropology, both of Perm State University, have produced a well-integrated discussion of the nature of evolution, which properly approaches the subject at the level of molecular genetics, before proceeding to discuss biological speciation. They observe that even today's knowledge of genetics does not permit us to fully understand how evolution works, and they cause the reader to reflect more deeply on the intricacy of the topic.

One gains the impression that although Henri Bergson is one scholar that Weiss and Buchanan do not mention, their conclusions come perilously close to his concept of the eacute;lan vital They are clearly not happy with the idea that evolution could have occurred solely and simply as a product of mechanical Darwinian selection. This leads them to hint at some vague driving force within living organisms that causes them to evolve, and also, rather quixotically, to present the integrated nature of complex organism as "cooperation" between the component parts.

Possibly, in their early student days, they may have become involved in the ethical fashion for favoring cooperation over competition, since something of this does enter into their discussion in a rather artificial, forced, kind of way. Thus they correctly show how competition is not the sole driving force in evolution, but ignore group competition as a selective force.

While stressing the importance of cooperation between members of a group in promoting that group's survival chances, (cf. humans and wolves), they ignore the complementary truth, that there is reproductive competition between individuals and also between groups. And they seem not to be interested in the fact that cooperation within a group enhances the competitive survival chances of that group, in the same way that cooperation between the members of a team enhances the competitive chances of the team. They argue that organisms are made up of "cooperating molecules," but this use of the term competition is a rather strained extenuation of the bi-polar philosophical dichotomy of cooperation versus competition. We may suppose that cancer is an example of cells within an organism that fail to "cooperate," as also diseases in which the protective agents go wild and attack the body's own organs. But is this truly what we mean when we speak of cooperation and competition as elements of the evolutionary process?

Darwinian competition, which they seem anxious to downplay, takes place between different organisms competing to reproduce, and cooperation within the members of a breeding population enhances the ability of that population to survive in competition with rivals competing for access to the limited supply of resources necessary for survival. In the opinion of this reviewer, the debate over the relative merits competition versus cooperation as an evolutionary force is rather like debating which is more important, the cart or the horse. Competition and cooperation both play significant roles in determining the evolutionary history of mammals, as also of birds, if not many other living organisms.

Nevertheless, it is a fact that many biologists remain in awe of the mystic power that seems to drive evolution, arid it remains hard to accept as adequate the purely mechanical explanation behind the concept of "survival of the fittest. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Genetics and the Logic of Evolution
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.