Technology and Choice: George Grant's Disparate Ethical and Legal Positions on Abortion

By Gerrie, James B. | Journal of Canadian Studies, Fall 2004 | Go to article overview

Technology and Choice: George Grant's Disparate Ethical and Legal Positions on Abortion


Gerrie, James B., Journal of Canadian Studies


Although the victory of the Liberals under Paul Martin in the most recent federal election on a platform that included protecting the access of women to abortion indicates that many Canadians remain committed to a pro-choice position, the controversy surrounding the issue of abortion suggests that it remains a live political question. Those who would look to the work of the influential Canadian political thinker George Grant for insight, and to the main commentators on his position, might come to the conclusion that his work fits easily into the pro-life camp. The author argues that Grant's views are more ambiguous than his commentators on this issue suggest. Grant's views on abortion are grounded in a radical understanding of technology, and this understanding prevents Grant from speaking unambiguously about the question of the proper legal status of abortion. Instead, his understanding of technology requires adopting a perspective on the issue that would have us reject the polarized political positions of the pro-life and pro-choice movements.

Bien que la victoire des Libéraux, sous la direction de Paul Martin au cours des dernières élections fédérales, avec un programme comprenant la protection de l'accès à l'avortement pour les femmes, indique que plusieurs Canadiens et Canadiennes continuent d'être pro-choix, la controverse soulevée par cette question suggère qu'elle a encore une grande importance dans l'univers politique. Les personnes qui examinent l'oeuvre de George Grant, théoricien politique canadien de grande influence, ainsi que les nombreux commentaires sur son idéologie, peuvent croire que son oeuvre s'intègre bien au mouvement pro-choix. Je crois toutefois que ceci est incorrect et que les opinions de M. Grant sont plus ambiguës que les commentaires le suggèrent. Les opinions de M. Grant sur l'avortement se fondent sur une compréhension radicale de la technologie et cette compréhension empêche M. Grant de discuter sans ambiguïté du statut juridique approprié de l'avortement. Sa compréhension de la technologie nécessite plutôt l'adoption d'un point de vue qui nous ferait rejeter les prises de position politiques polarisées des mouvements pro-vie et pro-choix.

In the second half of the last century, George Grant was part of an advance guard of Canadian contributors to the nascent field of the philosophy of technology (Mackey and Mitcham 1972, 13-14). Aspects of his work that call for specific limits to technological development, however, have been largely overlooked by his fellow academics.1 For the most part, his cultural critique of technology has been lost to public consciousness outside the academy. For instance, although in the 1970s Grant's work rallied nationalist Tories, leftist Liberals, and social democrats, he is currently remembered by many as a nostalgic "Anglo conservative" (Rawlinson and Granatstein 1997, 188).2 One thing, perhaps more than anything else, has helped contribute to the predominance of this latter view: he is well known for being an anti-abortionist. Leah Bradshaw observes that "We are all familiar with the stand-off in rights discourse concerning the rights of women versus the rights of the unborn. Grant immerses himself in this debate and takes the side of the unborn" (1996, 220-21). Samuel Ajzenstat also argues that Grant's anti-abortionist stance implies that he favours the rights of the unborn over the rights of women. Ajzenstat admits, however, that "we cannot entirely tell from Grant's text what the upshot of such a position would be for the many details of the abortion issue, e.g., on the question of what might be acceptable grounds for abortion or on who would be most fit to make such decisions or on how compliance with these decisions could be obtained" (1992, 97). Although both of these commentators place Grant squarely in the pro-life camp, we are left to conclude from their analyses that although he felt strongly that abortion involved the taking of an innocent human life, this conclusion did not require his endorsement of any specific legal limits on abortion.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Technology and Choice: George Grant's Disparate Ethical and Legal Positions on Abortion
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.