Anti-Semitism and US-Israel Relations: Trouble for Middle East Specialists - and Their Critics

By Clarke, Duncan L. | The Middle East Journal, Autumn 2004 | Go to article overview

Anti-Semitism and US-Israel Relations: Trouble for Middle East Specialists - and Their Critics


Clarke, Duncan L., The Middle East Journal


Anti-Semitism and US-Israel Relations: Trouble for Middle East Specialists - and Their Critics [A response by Abraham H. Foxman follows.] Never Again?: The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism, by Abraham H. Foxman. New York: HarperCollins, 2003. xii + 279 pages. Source notes to p. 294. Index to p. 305. $24.95.

Not since the 1950s, when Senator Joseph McCarthy (R-WI) defamed knowledgeable China hands, have area specialists been assaulted so recklessly. As the United States sinks more deeply into Middle Eastern sands, many experts on this region are being subjected to what Columbia University's Rashid Khalidi characterizes as a "pervasive atmosphere of intimidation and fear."1 This pall deters candid discussion of issues, especially those related to Israel. A principal reason for this assault on Middle East area studies is that the Arab-Israeli dispute is fought at home as well as abroad and the cards are stacked heavily in favor of Israel's American advocates. Free speech and sound policy development suffer as a consequence, particularly in the post-9/11 era.

In addition to the long reach of the USA Patriot Act and the denunciation of specialists in Middle East area studies by the likes of Israeli-American Martin Kramer and Israel partisan Daniel Pipes,2 a bill backed by pro-Israel neoconservatives and passed by the House of Representatives in October 2003 (H.R. 3077) would, if enacted into law, create an advisory board that could severely restrict academic freedom. The board would be authorized to "monitor" and "evaluate" the activities of Title VI-supported area studies centers to ensure that they "reflect diverse perspectives." This language is neither neutral nor benign. It would likely have the perverse effect of forcing university area studies centers to curb criticism of Israel and US Middle East policy.3

More recently, the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations incorporated chilling new language into their grant agreements. Ford's provisions state that the Foundation will withdraw funding if any university expenditure, regardless of source, promotes "violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state." Rockefeller's language directs that a grantee shall not "directly or indirectly engage in, promote or support other organizations or individuals who engage in or promote terrorist activity." The foundations inserted these stipulations in response to several Jewish individuals and organizations who complained that Ford Foundation money funded Palestinian groups that orchestrated activities critical of Israel at the 2001 United Nations conference in Durban, South Africa.4 The Ford stipulations were instituted on the advice of former White House liaison to the Jewish community Stuart Eizenstat and David Harris of the American Jewish Committee. Harris declared the conditions "eminently reasonable."5

Because such vague and ambiguous language can clearly be abused, the provosts of many distinguished universities (Harvard, Cornell, Yale, Chicago, Stanford, MIT, etc.) co-signed letters to the foundations in 2004 warning that these new provisions "run up against the basic principle of protected speech on our campuses." The universities, of course, fear that the language jeopardizes normal campus activities: lectures, debates, demonstrations, and film and photo displays.

This threat to open dialogue on Israel and US Middle East policy comes from those who traditionally champion freedom of expression in virtually all other spheres: prominent representatives of the American Jewish community.6 This paradox is reflected in Abraham Foxman's, Never Again ? The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism (New York: Harper San Francisco, 2003). Foxman is the long-time head of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). He sees a "new anti-Semitism" that is global in scope and comparable in gravity to the 1930s. Foxman contends that his book, while not "a work of scholarship," holds "lessons for combating anti-Semitism" (pp. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Anti-Semitism and US-Israel Relations: Trouble for Middle East Specialists - and Their Critics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.