Philosophy and Theology: A Handmaid's Tale

By Baber, Harriet E. | Anglican Theological Review, Spring 2001 | Go to article overview

Philosophy and Theology: A Handmaid's Tale


Baber, Harriet E., Anglican Theological Review


Philosophy has traditionally been called "the handmaid of theology." It is indeed the handmaid to theology-and to all other academic disciplines. Philosophers do conceptual housework, cleaning up after people and organizing their stuff-that is what "philosophy of__" is about: philosophy of science, philosophy of art, philosophy of religion and metaphysics-which can best be understood as philosophy of common sense.

A handmaid's job is not an easy one. Many people don't realize how much housework there is to be done and think we don't do anything. And some get annoyed when, in tidying up, we mess around with their stuff.

Philosophy and theology enjoy a peculiarly intimate relationship because they have traditionally been concerned with many of the same issues: the nature and existence of God, the possibility of postmortem survival, the problem of free will and human responsibility, and a whole host of questions about how we should live that fall under the rubric of ethics. Such familiarity breeds territorial disputes and theologians have sometimes been annoyed with us for messing with their stuff. So I almost subtitled this essay, "Why can't we just get along?"

Some of my best friends are theologians. We muse about our differences. I think one thing that is going on is that we have very different views about what philosophy is.

There has never been an industry standard for philosophy and until very recently philosophers have not reflected extensively on the nature of the philosophical enterprise. This is probably because in the beginning everything was philosophy. It was the other disciplines that became self-conscious about their programs and split off-natural philosophy which quickly evolved into physics, chemistry, biology and their various subdisciplines, mathematics, and, later, economics and the social sciences. Philosophy was what was left over, the residue that wasn't anything else. So philosophers just did it-and kept doing it.

The nature of philosophy is itself a philosophical question. What do I do? When my children were very young they were satisfied when I told them that I was a teacher, later that I was a professor; when they inquired more closely, I had no short answer, though to their distress I could give examples of what I was doing, the problems that interested me and how I dealt with them.

Philosophy analyzes concepts that figure in other disciplines and in ordinary life. It attempts to articulate our intuitions, to flush out any logical incoherence and fix it. Its method is deductive argument.

Some of the classic philosophical questions are: What are physical objects: do they exist independent of minds? How do we know? What is it to perceive a physical object: is it to be directly aware of an object or its proximate surface? If so, how do we explain illusion, hallucination, and other cases of non-veridical perception? What are persons: are they identical to their bodies or to some bodily parts, such as their brains? What is our criterion for personal identity: what is it that makes me-now the same person as me-five-minutes-ago? What is a work of art? What is a scientific theory? Do numbers exist? If so, what are they?

These problems are more vexing than they may appear to be at first blush and are not amenable to scientific investigation. They are peculiar in that even when all the data is in, even when we have all the facts, we still may not know what to say.

As a sample, consider the trivial but paradigmatic philosophical question inherent in the puzzle about the bear who walks a mile south, a mile east, a mile north and ends up where he started. How can that be? Most people get the punch line fairly quickly: he's a polar bear, get it? Nevertheless, explaining why this "works" at the poles but not on the equator takes more doing. Late at night, after I'd posed this question in class, a student called me to ask whether it "had something to do with magnetic fields. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Philosophy and Theology: A Handmaid's Tale
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.