Adjudication & the British Courts

By Lloyd, Humphrey | Dispute Resolution Journal, May-July 2001 | Go to article overview

Adjudication & the British Courts


Lloyd, Humphrey, Dispute Resolution Journal


The international ADR movement has apawned a hybrid process called adjudication in the United Kingdom. A mechanism that is often binding, adjudication has features that are similar to the early neutral evaluation and arbitration processes as practiced in the United States. In the following piece, Humphrey Lloyd discusses the nature, origins, advantages, and disadvantages of adjudication as it applies to the construction industry. He also discusses the impact of the UK's Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act on the adjudication process.

The author is a judge of the Technology and Construction Court in London, which is a part of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales. Prior to becoming a judge in 1993, he was a barrister and arbitrator specializing in construction disputes.

This article is based on a paper presented by the author at a conference in Hong Kong in November 2000, and was later published in the April 2001 issue of the International Construction Law Review (ICLR).

This article describes the system of adjudication as it is now employed in Great Britain as provided by Part II of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA or the Act). The system applies to contracts made after May 1, 1998. Part II of the Act applies only to work done in Great Britain, not in Northern Ireland.

The law relating to adjudication is evolving primarily as a result of applications for summary judgment. On such applications the outcome may only be that the defendant has realistic prospects of success in its proposed defense, not that the defense is right on the facts or in law. Conversely, if the application succeeds, the claimant's claim is upheld as right on the facts and in law. In many respects, therefore, the law and practice cannot be regarded as settled. Cases in the courts do not provide a foundation for a conclusion as to whether or not adjudication is working satisfactorily. I refer to them only to illustrate points.

In this article, I am not expressing any view about the law, nor about the policy of adjudication in the UK forum. Policy is for the construction industry.

Nature and Origins

Adjudication as discussed in this article is somewhat of a misnomer. A judge or arbitrator adjudicates. In this sense, adjudication is or should therefore be synonymous with a judicial process but it is not.

For most of the construction industry in the United Kingdom, adjudication now means a process by which within a short and defined time and with a curtailed procedure left primarily to the adjudicator, all disputes under most construction contracts have to be presented to and decided by a person who will not be the arbitrator or the judge (unless of course the parties agree). The decision is binding (and is swiftly enforceable) until the dispute is considered and decided by the ultimate tribunal. The dispute is then considered on its own merits, without regard to the decision of the adjudicator so that there is, in this sense, no appeal from the adjudicator.

The aim of adjudication is simple: a dispute is resolved in such a manner that the parties perforce have to put it behind them and get on with the contract or with the remainder of their relationship (if either still exists). The decision of an adjudicator may also give the parties a better idea of what the decision of the ultimate tribunal might be-whether an arbitrator or a judge. Obviously the reliability of any forecast based upon that decision in turn depends upon the quality of the decision and the material and time available to the adjudicator, as well as, of course, the ability of the person involved.

It is therefore relevant at this stage to note that in 2000, on the second anniversary of the introduction of statutory adjudication,' Building (a leading construction industry journal in the UK) carried out, in conjunction with the wellknown firm of solicitors, CMS Cameron McKenna, a survey of contractors, consultants, subcontractors, and employers.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Adjudication & the British Courts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.