The Spiral of Silence and Public Opinion on Affirmative Action

By Moy, Patricia; Domke, David et al. | Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Spring 2001 | Go to article overview

The Spiral of Silence and Public Opinion on Affirmative Action


Moy, Patricia, Domke, David, Stamm, Keith, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly


This study sought to more fully explicate the key variables involved in Noelle-Neumann's spiral of silence theory, which states that fear of isolation keeps individuals from expressing opinions perceived to be in the minority. We tested the theory in the context of public discussion about affirmative action policies, a domain seemingly ideal due to its moral and value-laden characteristics. Data from 217 randomly selected adults in October 1998 indicate that fear of isolation indeed prevents one from publicly voicing perceived minority opinions. Willingness to speak out on a controversial ballot initiative was predicted also by demographics, media use, and importance of the issue. However, it was perceived consonance of one's opinion with family and friends-rather than society at large-that predicted willingness to speak out.

In recent years, citizens in several states have voted to repeal affirmative action laws and policies that had been enacted in the 1960s and 1970s with the goal of ensuring equal opportunity regardless of race and gender. This trend, which began with the passage of Proposition 209 in California in 1996, reflects a sentiment among some individuals that such statutes do more to harm than help contemporary race and gender relations; others disagree, arguing that affirmative action policies may not be perfect but that the best approach is to revise, rather than eliminate, these laws.1 This public debate about affirmative action continues, with many Americans deeply divided about appropriate strategies to implement and/or maintain race and gender equality.2

Public discussion about affirmative action is rife with conflict, competing moral claims, and extreme sensitivity as to which views are socially acceptable. As Alvarez and Brehm contend, "Few contemporary policy debates are as conflictual as the debates over policies intended to redress racial inequality."3 Of course, affirmative action policies encompass concerns about both race and gender, which only further heightens the conflict. Such an issue, therefore, provides an ideal context in which to test hypotheses derived from the spiral of silence theory. This theory, as formulated by Noelle-Neumann, suggests that with respect to issues that are morally laden and controversial, people refrain from expressing opinions they perceive are or will be shared by a minority of the public.4 This process is thought to occur because individuals fear isolation from the broader society. Some scholars have argued, however, that the isolation feared by individuals is from reference groups, not society at large.5 Insight into these differing opinion climates seems likely in the context of affirmative action, in which social rejection may very well occur if one says the wrong thing at the wrong time to the wrong person or group. Further, given the sensitivity of this long-standing issue, most people likely would be aware of the risks of being ostracized for holding a socially unacceptable view. At the same time, a variety of other factors, including the importance of an issue, one's level of education, and exposure to news coverage, may influence a person to speak out about a topic.6

With this in mind, this study explores the factors contributing to people's willingness to speak publicly on controversial topics, with a particular focus on the concept of fear of isolation. We examine these relationships by assessing individuals' outlooks on Initiative 200, a Washington state ballot initiative in fall 1998 that proposed to end considerations of race, ethnicity, and gender in public employment, education, and contract decisions. Initiative 200 was an issue of substantial conflict, generating considerable news coverage, public demonstrations, and political advertisements, and was the subject of numerous polls during the campaign. Our analysis focuses on data collected in a survey of adults in King County (which includes Seattle) during the final weeks of the election season. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Spiral of Silence and Public Opinion on Affirmative Action
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.