Fairness of Impression Management in Employment Interviews: A Cross-Country Study of the Role of Equity and Machiavellianism

By Lopes, Joana; Fletcher, Clive | Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, November 20, 2004 | Go to article overview

Fairness of Impression Management in Employment Interviews: A Cross-Country Study of the Role of Equity and Machiavellianism


Lopes, Joana, Fletcher, Clive, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal


This study focused on the use of Impression Management (IM) in employment interviews from the perspective of interviewees and investigated possible antecedents of their perceptions regarding what is fair interviewee IM. Its rationale was largely based on the tenets of equity theory (Adams, 1963; 1965). Data from 163 potential interviewees (college students) approached in the UK and Portugal showed that, as expected, they tended to perceive as fair interviewee IM those IM tactics they also saw as fair for interviewers to use. Gender did not predict IM fairness perceptions, but IM use by the organization, Machiavellianism and Country did. Results regarding the influence of experience of job interviews were inconclusive. Finally, based on these findings, suggestions are made for further research and for the education of both interviewees and interviewers regarding behavior in the employment interview.

Impression management [IM] refers to individuals' attempts at determining the impressions others form of them regarding their behavior, motivation, morality, and other characteristics such as their intelligence and future potential (Rosenfeld, Giacalone, & Riordan, 1994). IM can be verbal and nonverbal, more or less deliberate, and be stimulated by both situational and dispositional factors (Rosenfeld, Giacalone, & Riordan, 1994; 2002; Schlenker & Weigold, 1992). Employment interviews, in particular, would appear to foster conscious IM efforts by both parties, given the situation's "high stakes" (Delery & Kacmar, 1998; Gardner & Martinko, 1988; Rosenfeld, 1997; Rosenfeld et al, 2002). This study is concerned with any attempts by the interview parties to present themselves/their organization in a good light.

IM USE AND THE VALIDITY AND FAIRNESS OF INTERVIEWS

In selection and recruitment interviews, candidates' IM efforts can positively affect interview outcomes such as employment offers and ratings by interviewers (e.g., Kacmar, Delery, & Ferris, 1992; Stevens & Kristof, 1995), although not necessarily so. Indeed, all individuals are not equally skilled at IM (Turnley & Bolino, 2001), interviewer characteristics - such as warmth - can affect interviewee IM and interview performance (e.g., Liden, Martin, & Parsons, 1993), and not all IM tactics seem to be equally situation-appropriate (Kacmar et al.). Finally, a low degree of congruence between the interviewee and interviewer definitions of the situation can potentially jeopardize the efficacy of IM tactics (Gardner & Martinko, 1988).

Since interviewee and interviewer IM styles may have an impact on interview outcomes, concerns have been raised about the possible effect of IM on the validity and fairness of selection decisions (i.e., the ability to assess how well candidates would do on the job without discriminating against those less skilled in situation-appropriate IM). Nevertheless, there is no agreement regarding how much of an issue this is as, for instance, the ability to carry out effective IM can be seen as an important competence that favors job performance and is therefore no cause for concern (e.g., Delery & Kacmar, 1998; Fletcher, 1989; 1990; Rosenfeld, 1997; Rosenfeld et al., 2002; Stevens & Kristof, 1995).

Various ways of minimizing any undesirable impact of candidate IM on interview selection decisions have been suggested. Where the ability to use certain IM tactics is seen to be job-relevant, research suggests that the choice of interview question format may help elicit the use of relevant IM tactics (ElHs, West, Ryan, & DeShon, 2002). Another line of proposals encourages organizations to prepare to cope with potentially misleading candidate IM attempts, such as by concentrating on verifiable information (see Fletcher, 1989; Rosenfeld, 1997). Yet another suggests attempting to influence the interview parties to adopt a more ethical or mutually beneficial stance (Fletcher, 1989; 1992a; 1992b; Kirkwood & Ralston, 1996; 1999).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Fairness of Impression Management in Employment Interviews: A Cross-Country Study of the Role of Equity and Machiavellianism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.