A Multisample Item Response Theory Analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory-1A

By Bedi, Robinder P; Maraun, Michael D et al. | Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, July 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

A Multisample Item Response Theory Analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory-1A


Bedi, Robinder P, Maraun, Michael D, Chrisjohn, Roland D, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science


Abstract

The widespread employment of the Beck Depression Inventory-1A (BDI-1A) has spawned a number of practices: 1) The employment of an unweighted total score as a measure of depression; 2) Its use in populations other than that in which it was normed; and 3) The employment of BDI-1A total scores in hypothesis tests about population differences in mean depression. A sequential procedure based on item response theory was employed to assess the validity of these practices for the case of four populations: clinical depressives, mixed nondepressed psychiatric patients, and students from two different universities. The findings suggested that the first practice was not justified for any of these populations, that the BDI-1A was employable only with clinical depressives and with one of the university populations, and that mean comparisons were not allowable.

Resume

L'emploi largement repandu de l'inventaire de depression de Beck - Version 1A (IDB-1A) a engendre de nombreuses pratiques: 1) l'utilisation des scores obtenus comme mesures de la depression; 2) le recours A l'IDB aupres de populations differentes de celles pour qui ce test a ete concu ; et 3) l'application des scores totaux obtenus A l'IDB-1A a des tests d'hypotheses portant sur les differences de l'indice moyen de depression dans une population. On a evalue la validite de telles pratiques au moyen d'une procedure sequentielle basee sur la theorie de la reponse d'item aupres de quatre populations differentes : des personnes souffrant de depression clinique, des patients en etablissement psychiatrique souffrant ou non de depression, et des etudiants de deux universites distinctes. Les conclusions de l'etude revelent que le recours a la premiere pratique n'etait justifie aupres d'aucune des populations, que l'usage de Pros-l'IDB-1A n'etait approprie qu'aupres de la population composee de personnes souffrant de depression clinique et que les comparaisons des indices moyens de depression n'etaient pas acceptables.

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck, Ward, Mendelson, Mock, & Erlbaum, 1961) is a self-report inventory developed to assess the "depth" of depression of individuals already diagnosed as depressed (Beck, 1972, p.187). Each of the twenty-one items corresponds to a particular, putative symptom of depression, and is paired with a 4-point Likert response scale. In 1979, Beck, Rush, Shaw, and Emery published a modified version of the original Beck in which alternative wordings for the same symptoms, and double negatives, were eliminated. This revised version, the BDI-1A, has become one of the most popular instruments for the assessment of depression (Piotrowski & Keller, 1992).

The widespread employment of the BDI-1A in both research and applied settings has spawned a number of related practices, among these: 1) The employment of a simple, unweighted composite of BDI-1A items (i.e., total score) as a measure of depression; 2) The employment of the BDI-1A in populations other than that in which it was normed; 3) The use of the BDI-lA total score as input into tests of hypotheses about population mean differences in level of depression. Each of these practices is justified by specific kinds of psychometric evidence. For while the scoring of a test as a single composite of the items, and, in particular, an unweighted linear composite, is, in certain quarters, virtually the default, this practice is justified only given that, within the population of interest, the test items behave psychometrically in a particular way. Usually, the requirement is that the items manifest a particular brand of unidimensionality. With respect to the second practice, the BDI-1A was normed in a population comprised of clinically depressed in- and outpatients. Assuming that it had been shown to perform satisfactorily within this norming population, its employment in any other population, say population B, would then be justified by evidence of its satisfactory performance in this population.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

A Multisample Item Response Theory Analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory-1A
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?