A Legal Appraisal of Military Action in Iraq

By Terry, James P. | Naval War College Review, Summer 2004 | Go to article overview

A Legal Appraisal of Military Action in Iraq


Terry, James P., Naval War College Review


The determination by the George W. Bush administration to enter Iraq and remove the regime of Saddam Hussein from power in early 2003 followed twelve years of Iraqi violations of United Nations security Council resolutions. Prior to the decision by the United States and its coalition partners to intervene in Iraq with military force, Saddam Hussein had done everything possible to avoid complying with the will of the international community. Of the twenty-six demands made by the security Council since 1990, Iraq had complied with only three. Equally significant, the regime's repression of the Iraqi people continued.

The 2 October 2002 joint resolution of Congress authorizing the use of all means, including force, to bring Iraq into compliance was merely one of a series of actions by Congress to address Baghdad's noncompliance with its international obligations.1 In 1998, for example, Congress passed a similar resolution declaring that Iraq's continuing weapons of mass destruction programs threatened vital U.S. interests as well as international peace and security; declaring Iraq to be "in material breach of its international obligations"; and urging President Clinton "to take all appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligations."2

These congressional and UN Security Council resolutions were not the only outcries for change. In the Iraq Liberation Act, passed in 1998, lawmakers expressed the sense of Congress that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the Iraqi regime from power and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.3 The reasons for this strong congressional reaction to the Hussein regime rested not solely on Iraqi defiance of United Nations resolutions but also on Saddam Hussein's repression of the Iraqi people, his support for international terrorism, and his refusal to account for Gulf War prisoners or to return stolen property to Kuwait following the 1990-91 conflict, as well as the Baathist regime's efforts to circumvent economic sanctions.

FRAMEWORK AND CONTEXT

This article examines these Iraqi violations in the context of contemporary international law standards justifying intervention. More significantly, it examines the right of states to enforce mandates issued by the security Council and to redress violations of its edicts when the Council, as a body, refuses to do so. This is precisely what occurred when the Baathist regime refused to comply fully with the requirements of UN security Council Resolution 1441. Finally, the article examines the independent authority available to states, such as the right to intervene to address a threat to international peace and security under Article 51 of the Charter and to invoke the doctrine of humanitarian intervention, when the security Council cannot or will not act although its edicts have been clearly violated.

The intervention by the United States and its coalition partners in Iraq in March 2003 must be viewed as a significant historical precedent in the relationship of a major power to the security Council. Previously, in 1998 in Kosovo, the United States and a coalition largely made up of NATO partners had intervened to rescue and protect the threatened Albanian population from Serb aggression without specific security Council approval. While the military action in Kosovo could arguably be justified as a humanitarian intervention, the coalition entry into Iraq in 2003 was justified on the basis of repeated violations of UN security Council resolutions under Chapter VII (authorizing all necessary means) and of the threat to international peace and security in the region and the world community posed by the Saddam Hussein regime as a result thereof. As President Bush stated to the UN General Assembly on 12 September 2002:

Twelve years ago, Iraq invaded Kuwait without provocation.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Legal Appraisal of Military Action in Iraq
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.